Draconomics
Fearless Papa of The Brethren of the Crust
I'll just say this, and please don't take offense, I mean absolutely no harm to your religious beliefs. Scientific concepts can be tested and theories falsified. You can't test a vaguely described firmament made by an invisible diety. It's your right to believe in those things, but you also have to understand that science thus far has been the best explanation of our world and the cosmos. The theories that have come out of its advancement have allowed us to become a modern society, whereas if we advanced based on adherence to a religious dogma, it would have us in a perpetual dark age. Tell me where in scripture they explain germs? How about electrons? How about the molecular structure of water?So Again, Why Do So Many "World Organizations" Use Flat Earth As Their Logo? There Are Many Other "3 D" Logos By Other Companies So It Is Clearly A Choice That These Organizations Use The Flat Earth Map As Their Logo.
You Dismiss The Bible And Label It As Being Insignificant Due To It's Writings Being From People And Tribes Who Participated In Its Writings Yet You Claim The Things You Believe, That Are Written By People Participating In The Writings You Chose To Believe, To Be Accurate? That Sounds Like A Belief System Difference (Which Is Fine) But The Measuring Stick Appears The Same, Just A Different Source (In Essence).
You Make The Comment If It Was There We Would Know About It. Are You Sure About That? We Know What The Real Powers That Be Want Us To Know Or Feed Us To Know To Support Their Narrative (No Matter What It May Be) And If A Person Has A Differing Thought Then They Are Attacked And Labeled As Wrong Or A CS Or Whatever Other Label Is Trending At The Time. Real True "Science" Should Always Be Questioned And Put To The Test. Political Science Is Another Thing Entirely And The The Problem Is That Political Science Is Being Called "Science" And They Are Not The Same.
If A Person Is Unwilling To Open Themselves Up To Explore Possibility And Are Quick To Dismiss A New Thought Or Idea Then They Radically Reduce Their Potential For Growth And Advancement. People Should Be Able To Talk About Anything And Be Heard As There Is Much To Learn In Doing So. It Isn't Always About Changing Your Pint Of View But Rather You Viewing Point.![]()
Also, you are aware that there's other creation stories similar to Genesis? What about the Apocryphal books of Enoch? They describe in even better detail the creation of the world, including the concept of a 364 day year. These books were considered as valid as the Mosaic books we are familiar with. Why isn't that account as valid? Just sayin.
I'm fully open to any concept, no matter how absurd, but if the evidence and data cannot support it's validity, then it's wrong and I'm forced to move on. I'll say it again, there is ZERO evidence of a dome-like structure encompassing the Earth, and I can say that with confidence. Think of it like this...we have millions of pictures of the globe Earth from space. You can say Earth photos are fake, but all we need is ONE to be real and flat earth and firmament theories are done. Flat Earth researchers have, in all this time, amassed ZERO pictures or videos of the firmament. Even if it's just a score of 1-0, you're still losing.
Last edited: