Bogner
Redwood Original - Pure Blood
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2016
- Messages
- 6,212
I Have One And It Is Great. Fixed Bridge Grissoms Rule!Great, now I have to consider a DGT for the collection. I just wish they made more non-trem versions of it.
I Have One And It Is Great. Fixed Bridge Grissoms Rule!Great, now I have to consider a DGT for the collection. I just wish they made more non-trem versions of it.
Wildwood had the limited run of Stoptail DGT’s or DGS’s in this case.I Have One And It Is Great. Fixed Bridge Grissoms Rule!
I'm ebony on acoustic, too. The guitar you posted is fabulous looking, and I'll bet the neck makes all the difference.It’s funny, typically on electric I’m a RW guy for fretboards, but ebony on acoustic. This guitar is my only exception, but oh boy it sounds fabulous.
My new 594 SC SH has an ebony fretboard, and I love it!
Clarity but no loss of girth. Lot of times what is described as clarity sounds a bit thin to my (not so good) ears. Tim always sounds amazing!OK, remember the bit I said about the clarity of tone on the DGT?
Listen to the first few notes Tim Pierce plays on the blue DGT starting at 03:03 early in the first video I posted above. That's it; and it's what I can't put into words.
It's that elusive tone quality that just grabs me by the ears and says, "This is what electric guitar is supposed to sound like!"
Granted, we all have different tastes and ideas, and I only speak for myself. I'm not proselytizing here - that kind of sound may not be your thing, and that's OK.
But for me? That big, solid, open sound drives an amp (tube of course!! ) the right way.
"Can you play like Tim Pierce, Laz?"
"No, I play like me, which is to say, not as well. But I like to play what I play with a tone I like."
"That's not good enough for me, sir! You don't deserve that guitar!"
"Yeah, So what else is new?"
Yep. That's basically what I meant when I said the guitar is clear, crisp and bright, but has a solid fundamental tone (vs. overtones). But clarity is often conflated with brightness, when the two are separate and distinct characteristics.Clarity but no loss of girth. Lot of times what is described as clarity sounds a bit thin to my (not so good) ears. Tim always sounds amazing!
Love me some Tim Pierce vidsThere's probably no need to write words in future posts. I can just use , embed videos and songs, or upload a few photos, and call it a story well-told.
So here goes:
That is a tough one for me... I had the PTC put 57/08s in my CU22 back in 09. Granted my CU22 is a stop tail so it isn't a complete 1 for 1 comparison but I still give a little bit of an edge to the wide fat neck on my CU22 over the DGT neck. I can pretty easily switch between the two guitars but I tend to like the feel just a tiny bit more of the CU22. I do have a set of DGT pickups I could throw in the CU22 to make it more of an apples to apples comparison but the 57/08s are just right for that guitar.I feel like there’s a good reason the CU22 got 86’ed, and that’s because the DGT is “it” for a 22 fret tremolo equipped PRS.
Don’t need or want one though.
I still love the 57/08s, and I agree, they're perfect with the CU22.That is a tough one for me... I had the PTC put 57/08s in my CU22 back in 09. Granted my CU22 is a stop tail so it isn't a complete 1 for 1 comparison but I still give a little bit of an edge to the wide fat neck on my CU22 over the DGT neck. I can pretty easily switch between the two guitars but I tend to like the feel just a tiny bit more of the CU22. I do have a set of DGT pickups I could throw in the CU22 to make it more of an apples to apples comparison but the 57/08s are just right for that guitar.
I am very fortunate that I have both and don't have to choose between which one to buy... I am very thankful for that.I still love the 57/08s, and I agree, they're perfect with the CU22.
To me, the DGT is a very specific combination of body thickness, trem, pickups and other accouterments in a perfect storm of genius ideas. It wouldn't suit me to try to turn my other guitars into a DGT. Plus, different choices are still a good thing to be able to make!
I may have some good news for you...They really are great guitars for many, but I dont like the shape of the neck and prefer an HSS setup, after owning one for a while.
I have a custom 22 soap bar from 2001 that has an amazing neck, I wish I knew what the neck profile was. I'd like to get a studio model with the same neck.
MyCU22 Soapbars both came with the Regular neck. I think that was the standard for the model.They really are great guitars for many, but I dont like the shape of the neck and prefer an HSS setup, after owning one for a while.
I have a custom 22 soap bar from 2001 that has an amazing neck, I wish I knew what the neck profile was. I'd like to get a studio model with the same neck.
Same thought here. High output pickups solved a problem that's no longer an issue.DGT is on my “need to try” list. I got my hands on the SE version recently, it was… okay, but I think that has more to do with the SE part than the DGT part. I’m recently seeing some cracks in the foundation of SE, which is something I don’t say lightly, but beside the point of this conversation…
I totally understand Disclaimer #2, but I have to say, the more I dig, the more I find that a humbucker guitar that works is a humbucker guitar that works, period. I can play classic rock, blues, metal, if it’s a winner. I’ve had a few go ‘rounds with high output pickups, and I just don’t get along with them - the need to slam the front of an amp via HO pickups is, for me, now negated by the ultra-wide selection of boost pedals and amps with insane amounts of gain, and comes at the cost of inherent tone, clarity, and richness of the amplified sound.
What years were those? When I bought my CU22 in 06, the wide fat neck carve was the most common. There was an occasional wide thin here and there. The CU24 is the model that you would occasionally see the Regular neck carve on. Most had a wide thin in 06. My CU24 has the WT. I also bought that one in 06.MyCU22 Soapbars both came with the Regular neck. I think that was the standard for the model.