Tonart
Tone of the Art......or is that backwards?
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2,755
LOL I was testing u guyshead... heard... gotta be careful confusing those two.
LOL I was testing u guyshead... heard... gotta be careful confusing those two.
I think maybe 50% of players I've heard aren't crazy about the birds. I would like to see a more generic block inlay as an option.
Oh, and solid pink or wood grain? I’m less of a fan of solid, my husband on the other hand loves a classic!
Pretty and unique, burst, maple neck, hum single hum!I'll never pass up an opportunity to post a pic of a pink guitar!
I never understand this if you want Gibson, buy one! Play a bunch of guitars and buy the one that suits you based on what it does for you.From what I've seen, quite a bit of the 'hatred' stems from older folks buying one and expecting it to just be exactly like a Gibson or a Fender down to every last detail. It's not, it's a separate entity, which I find for the better.
I shudder to think of PRS lowering their bar to Gibson's "authentic" territory, haha.
Pretty and unique, burst, maple neck, hum single hum!
WOW!Thanks! It's a Wood Library 509 that Brian's Guitars did. Swamp ash back, maple cap, maple neck and fret board. Those are actually 5 single coil pickups (the 5 in 509) that can produce 9 different pick up combinations using the mini toggles and 5 way blade.
Thanks! It's a Wood Library 509 that Brian's Guitars did. Swamp ash back, maple cap, maple neck and fret board. Those are actually 5 single coil pickups (the 5 in 509) that can produce 9 different pick up combinations using the mini toggles and 5 way blade.
And a great looking one at that!
I assume that the combination of those woods push the guitar - mostly the Single Coil sounds more towards the Stratty/tele side compared to the more LP Humbucker side as the standard Mahogany build is. I wouldn't swap mine for a Wood Library build personally but I can see why some may want that if they already have the more LP type Humbucker sounds that other PRS guitars offer.
I know its not right to say more LP or more Stratty with PRS guitars that are clearly their own thing but I am using these words to describe where the sound 'fits' between the two ends of that spectrum with A Les Paul (24.75" scale, double humbucker Mahogany based guitar with fixed bridge) and a Strat (25.5" scale, 3 Single coil, Ash/elder body/maple neck trem bridge guitar) at the other end - two very different guitars.
I assume (rightly or wrongly) that my standard 509 is more a double Humbucker type with the options of the Single coils and yours is more a 3 SC guitar with the option to make the Bridge/Neck into Humbuckers. I assume your SC sounds are closer to the stratty end than mine but mine maybe a bit closer to the LP double Humbucker sounds. Whether that is the case or not, they are great versatile instruments.
I never understand this if you want Gibson, buy one! Play a bunch of guitars and buy the one that suits you based on what it does for you.
As for the hate thing; I have to agree about the "all our heroes", "all the best sounds" etc statements. I don't think that hate is specific to PRS. Heck, look how G gets bashed every time they try to step away from 1958-1960. Granted, some of their "innovations" have not been good, but still.
I can understand bashing inferior quality, but if something is well made and doesn’t suit your particular needs/wants, shut up!I will never understand hate for an entire brand but you see it all the time. What brand gets bashed depends on the forum you're on. Clearly posts on this forum are complimentary to PRS and they should be. I've seen plenty of put downs of Gibson and Fender here although it's usually a little more subtle.
I don't always play PRS but I do love a good success story. The quality of the early production guitars changed the whole industry in my opinion. They raised the bar and made others step up so even if you didn't buy a PRS, you could benefit from their workmanship. Hard to hate that.
Yup. There will always be comparisons to those 50s and 60s Golden era guitars... it’s both a blessing and a curse. How many times do we describe a PRS by how stratty or LP-ish it is? I get that it’s a sound, a tone, that we are relating the PRS to, but doing so does pit the PRS up against the Strat and the LP... and to the Strat player or the LP player, that comparison usually ends up in PRS hate territory. They state the obvious: that the PRS is not a Strat and it’s not a LP. Well duh. Also, it’s a gamble to try to create a better upgraded clone of the Strat and the LP. I remember that the SS created lots of initial hate and discontent, lol, just like the 594 did. Some of those initial haters ended up selling their strats and LPs though.
I am one of those people who finally came to grips with the fact that my awesome PRS guitars will never sound exactly like a Strat or a LP. The PRSi could get close but that’s all. So I finally bought a Strat and a LP to go with my PRS. But it took a long time for me to come to that conclusion. Up until then, I had been trying to convince myself that ‘close’ was enough and it wasn’t. Now that I have Gibson’s and Fenders, I can fully appreciate the uniqueness of my PRS guitars, but prior to adding those two, I was growing frustrated with the PRS tone. It was never ‘hate’ but the frustration was very real despite the fact that I loved the PRS quality and body shape.
Now my Fenders, Gibson’s, and PRSi all play nicely together in the sandbox.