sergiodeblanc
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2012
- Messages
- 27,421
If you want to hear guys scream about something being overpriced check out some of the Gibson forums.
Do they have pictures of PRS there?
If you want to hear guys scream about something being overpriced check out some of the Gibson forums.
Do they have pictures of PRS there?
Do they have pictures of PRS there?
I think this more or less sums up my opinion on the original question as well.- PRS are not overpriced compared to comparable guitars of other makers. Especially if you are into fancy wood and paint. Great guitars, fair price.
- PRS has higher build quality and in general better quality control.
I whole heartedly agree with the first point but not necessarily the second. I consider all my instruments perfect 10’s. I can’t point to any of them a say “oh there’s a flaw” or “there is some sloppy workmanship”. If that were the case I would not have bought them.
Personal preferences and opinions, the spice of life!
Then you haven't been playing the right Gibsons and Fenders...both companies are putting out fine guitars...while I love my PRS...I have also played and acquired some great guitars by other manufacturers...I do believe that PRS is constantly innovating....more so than others....but to knock the others and say all the Gibsons and Fenders you've played recently are terrible makes me question whether or not you played any R9's or C/S when doing your comparisons.
Guitar brands are simply different from one another. It's just a preference, that's all.
Sometimes folks think they need to go looking for faults in what they don't want/have to reinforce their thinking re: what they do want/have.
Preferring PRS doesn't mean one has to dislike other brands. It doesn't mean that other brands aren't as good. Preferring other brands doesn't mean PRS aren't as good. It simply means that one's preferences in guitars work better for that person.
All the "this is overpriced," "this has poor QC," "this is blah blah blah," is merely someone else's opinion, and truly irrelevant to the person who happens to prefer it.
Guitar brands are simply different from one another. It's just a preference, that's all.
Sometimes folks think they need to go looking for faults in what they don't want/have to reinforce their thinking re: what they do want/have.
Preferring PRS doesn't mean one has to dislike other brands. It doesn't mean that other brands aren't as good. Preferring other brands doesn't mean PRS aren't as good. It simply means that one's preferences in guitars work better for that person.
All the "this is overpriced," "this has poor QC," "this is blah blah blah," is merely someone else's opinion, and truly irrelevant to the person who happens to prefer it.
Another +1
The value of any item is what the purchaser is willing to pay for it
For me, that's more about price than value.
Then you haven't been playing the right Gibsons and Fenders...both companies are putting out fine guitars...while I love my PRS...I have also played and acquired some great guitars by other manufacturers...I do believe that PRS is constantly innovating....more so than others....but to knock the others and say all the Gibsons and Fenders you've played recently are terrible makes me question whether or not you played any R9's or C/S when doing your comparisons.
Agreed Les … but if you place a high value on something, wouldn't you also be willing to pay more for it than a similar item you value less? ( I'm not trying to pick a fight…merely offering a point/counterpoint)
I don't see the point in arguing about things as subjective as this....