Xtcclassic
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
- Messages
- 267
Oh hey, now this is interesting. You didn't need to route any wood for the mounting wars on the baseplate?
If you would describe the difference between the bridges how would you describe them? They're both brass where they touch the strings, and I guess the rest of the wraparound is aluminum versus steel and of course different number of components, etc.
I've had Teles and wraparound guitars, but not at the same time and regardless the rest of the construction has been wildly different too (bolt vs set, maple and alder vs mahogany)
No routing needed as long as the pickguard is cut correctly (the edge of hole for the neck pickup that’s furthest from the fretboard end must be the same distance from the fretboard end as the stock pickguard, making the edge that’s closest to the fretboard end closer than on the stock pickguard).
I’m basing my opinion of top-loading bridges on teles, where they add a different sort of mojo. Something in the highs, like it adds a certain “airiness” to the tone (which makes it sound more “vintage” to my ear) and also a slinkier feel. Now that you’ve got me thinking about it, I’m not sure the difference would be the same with a wraparound bridge, but I’d bet money it would sound different in a different way. Like I said, I’m a fan of wraparound bridges, so it’s not as if I just don’t like them. I just love the Vela bridge (probably because I’ve always been a Tele guy) and I think it’s a brilliantly designed take on a Tele-style bridge and it’s one of the main things that make the Vela the Vela.