rickcard71
New Member
Obviously they couldn't use the same name, but a rather similar color named differently would avoid the lawsuit, Gibson can't trademark blue - though if anyone tried, it'd be Gibson.
I was joking.
Obviously they couldn't use the same name, but a rather similar color named differently would avoid the lawsuit, Gibson can't trademark blue - though if anyone tried, it'd be Gibson.
Obviously they couldn't use the same name, but a rather similar color named differently would avoid the lawsuit, Gibson can't trademark blue - though if anyone tried, it'd be Gibson.
Obviously they couldn't use the same name, but a rather similar color named differently would avoid the lawsuit, Gibson can't trademark blue - though if anyone tried, it'd be Gibson.
Usage list of Dupont paint code 4038L
1960 Cadillac Cadillac 24 Pelham Blue
1960 GM 24 Pelham Blue
1963 Fleet Gibson Firebird Pelham Blue 1963-69
As you can see, Gibson did not create this color, nor did they name it. Many of the trademarks would have been owned by DuPont and other paint manufacturers. Many (if not most) of these trademarks most likely would have expired after all this time.
However, it'd be a very simple thing to do a trademark search.
On the other hand, I don't know why PRS would want to use some other company's names for its colors - they've been pretty creative themselves.
I wanted a solid color 594 when they first came out - my local dealer called down to Maryland and his rep took a phone shot of the only one they had - I took it. I've never seen this metallic color listed as a 594 color - I think it came from the Custom 24 line at least 6 years ago now and I can't remember what they called it. I just like it. PS. I wish these links would just show up embedded in the post like they do at TGP - what am I doing wrong - I copy the link from imgur and put it in the post and you have to click on it to see it in a new browser window...
https://imgur.com/LE5TTnk
PS. I wish these links would just show up embedded in the post like they do at TGP - what am I doing wrong - I copy the link from imgur and put it in the post and you have to click on it to see it in a new browser window...
https://imgur.com/LE5TTnk
Dammmm, this is cool. My eyes say camo fretboard and headstock. Black narrowfield (if that's what it is) is so stealth. Black chrome tuners.... Love this thing!I approve this message! It took me forever to find a black top guitar that checked all my boxes.
Dammmm, this is cool. My eyes say camo fretboard and headstock. Black narrowfield (if that's what it is) is so stealth. Black chrome tuners.... Love this thing!
How about a pick of the back?
I think PRS goes way too far with so many choices of wood and colors for their tops.
There are so many variations of the same models, the only thing that sets them apart is structure of the wood. Do most buyers really get multiple versions of the same models based on the looks? In the end of the day they are just guitars, they are meant to be played, not admired for the nuances of the burst.
More solid options would be great, not everyone wants their guitar to look like grandma's furniture.
Nah, that’s what makes them appealing. I mean, I have solid color PRS, but I have more that aren’tI think PRS goes way too far with so many choices of wood and colors for their tops.
There are so many variations of the same models, the only thing that sets them apart is structure of the wood. Do most buyers really get multiple versions of the same models based on the looks? In the end of the day they are just guitars, they are meant to be played, not admired for the nuances of the burst.
More solid options would be great, not everyone wants their guitar to look like grandma's furniture.
how many do you have all together?Nah, that’s what makes them appealing. I mean, I have solid color PRS, but I have more that aren’t
Sixteen.how many do you have all together?
AmateurSixteen.
Amateur