I've owned Gibson LP's with wrap over tail pieces and the two piece bridges. Every guitar responds differently, so some that I had with the wrap over did not sound or sustain like some I had with the two piece bridges, and some wrap over tail pieces sounded better then some LP's I had with the two-piece bridge.
Gibson doesn't use the quality of hardware that PRS uses. If it was, you wouldn't be seeing so many Gibson LP players switching out the bridge and stop tails for after market types.
I've had no problem intonating the Gibson wrap over tail piece guitars. I remember PRS in a video stating that they were going for a vintage sounding guitar. Hence the scale, bridge type, pickup type, slightly fatter neck profile, toggle in the horn, etc. Imho, PRS is trying to get as close to a burst tone, but with modern architecture as possible.
I'm sure most, if not everyone here, sees and understands that. From what I have heard of the 594 videos and some of the PS McCarty videos posted on line, these guitars get as close, if not closer to a burst tone, as any Gibson I have ever heard. Based on that, it becomes a personal choice for which type of bridge assembly one prefers. ymmv