dmatthews
Dave's not here
You must wear the same size I doI love little quirky things in tops! Um, that may sound a little "dirty old man", but, if the shoe fits,,,,,,,
You must wear the same size I doI love little quirky things in tops! Um, that may sound a little "dirty old man", but, if the shoe fits,,,,,,,
Thanks Zack!Congratulations!
Congratulations. That is one hot guitar and the color is the same as my 594. It must be the "green"! I had a chance to play a 594 with P-90's recently. You are going to really like your new friend.
Thank you sir!Congratulations. That is one hot guitar and the color is the same as my 594. It must be the "green"! I had a chance to play a 594 with P-90's recently. You are going to really like your new friend.
OK...
...Although I typically leave both tone controls maxed, it's awesome at getting such a wide range of tone combinations just using the individual volume controls along with the 3-way switch.
Thanks Brian!looks VERY cool!!!
OMG... still buzzing from last night. You were/are right Joseph. These things are amazing. If I'm not mistaken, a P90 type pup is one of the oldest designs around, like 1939 or so. Obviously things have been refined/improved, but again... DAYUM...Now imagine how many more tones are available when you do decide to play with the tone knob! P90's are the secret weapon of tone...
Now imagine how many more tones are available when you do decide to play with the tone knob! P90's are the secret weapon of tone...
Like you, I don't mind Pattern thin/wide thin, but I prefer others.+1. I saw a Joe Bonamassa video where he illustrates the world of possibilities that is opened if you play with the tone knob. After I saw that I starter using it more often and man am I happy I did. I ended up loving my guitars even more, especially my McCarty.
I'm dying to try out a 594. I haven't tried a Pattern Vintage neck profile, but among the ones I've tried, contrary to my expectations, the pattern neck on my McCarty has become my favorite PRS neck profile. Before I started playing PRSi I played mostly slimmer Gibson necks (slim-taper & 60's neck). Prior to trying the 3 most common PRS neck profiles, I actually expected the Pattern Thin to become my favorite. However, I was completely wrong. It turned out that although I like the Pattern thin a lot, it is actually my least favorite among PRS neck profile. Nothing wrong the Pattern Thin, I just like the Patter and Pattern Regular better. Interestingly, the Pattern is a hair chunkier than the Pattern regular, but because of the shape of the carve on the Pattern I don't feel the thickness of the neck as much as on the Pattern Regular. What's attracting me about the 594 is the Pattern Vintage neck. I absolutely love the asymmetrical slim-tapered carve on Gibson High Performance models, though I prefer the fretboard width on their standard slim-tapered necks. Because the Pattern Vintage also has an asymmetrical carve, I conjecture I'll like it even more than the Pattern profile. It's hard to imagine that I'd like any guitar more than my McCarty, but if there is one guitar out there that might surpass my McCarty it would have to be a 594, especially if it's on the lighter side.
+1. I saw a Joe Bonamassa video where he illustrates the world of possibilities that is opened if you play with the tone knob. After I saw that I starter using it more often and man am I happy I did. I ended up loving my guitars even more, especially my McCarty.
I'm dying to try out a 594. I haven't tried a Pattern Vintage neck profile, but among the ones I've tried, contrary to my expectations, the pattern neck on my McCarty has become my favorite PRS neck profile. Before I started playing PRSi I played mostly slimmer Gibson necks (slim-taper & 60's neck). Prior to trying the 3 most common PRS neck profiles, I actually expected the Pattern Thin to become my favorite. However, I was completely wrong. It turned out that although I like the Pattern thin a lot, it is actually my least favorite among PRS neck profile. Nothing wrong the Pattern Thin, I just like the Patter and Pattern Regular better. Interestingly, the Pattern is a hair chunkier than the Pattern regular, but because of the shape of the carve on the Pattern I don't feel the thickness of the neck as much as on the Pattern Regular. What's attracting me about the 594 is the Pattern Vintage neck. I absolutely love the asymmetrical slim-tapered carve on Gibson High Performance models, though I prefer the fretboard width on their standard slim-tapered necks. Because the Pattern Vintage also has an asymmetrical carve, I conjecture I'll like it even more than the Pattern profile. It's hard to imagine that I'd like any guitar more than my McCarty, but if there is one guitar out there that might surpass my McCarty it would have to be a 594, especially if it's on the lighter side.
I have one too. Not gonna change a thing...I have a Soapbar II Maple, it’s a wonderful guitar. It sounds pretty darned good as is, but maybe a bridge and/or pup ugrade could make it better. The SE P90s are ok, but there are better aftermarket versions. The bridge has a little tilt, but no sitar sounds so far.