I've discovered that my preferences for complexity in gear are fairly polarized; I like guitars that are tonally flexible and keyboards/synths that have lots of knobs and sliders, but I prefer amps and pedals to be as simple and straightforward as possible. So it stands to reason that I would be drawn to PRS models like the Studio and 509, but I can't really see myself playing either one because they only come in 22-fret versions, and they're way too expensive to justify as secondary instruments.
I get the whole idea about people wanting a "classic' neck position sound, but my group has a few songs where I need the 23rd and 24th frets, plus it helps me visualize the fretboard better to have a full four octaves available. Being PRS guitars, you also lose out on the cool owl on a branch inlay...
It puzzles me why two guitars focused on versatility only have one option for the neck (I know they'd have to change the routing for the pickups as well). It's not like they can't put the 509 or Narrowfield pickups closer together or something.
I get the whole idea about people wanting a "classic' neck position sound, but my group has a few songs where I need the 23rd and 24th frets, plus it helps me visualize the fretboard better to have a full four octaves available. Being PRS guitars, you also lose out on the cool owl on a branch inlay...
It puzzles me why two guitars focused on versatility only have one option for the neck (I know they'd have to change the routing for the pickups as well). It's not like they can't put the 509 or Narrowfield pickups closer together or something.