The Fight
Long Hair Demigod
Hey what do you guys think about SED wing =c= tubes? I have some in my Friedman BE100 (Marshall style amp) and I really like them. That amp as hairy as it gets in my opinion sounds the best in low to mid gain. I get some amazing ACDC tones and has a great option to boost strat like/ coiltap guitars, making it great for Hendrix and naturally classic rock in general. I also have two 100 watt Splawn quickrods, both like Marshall jcm 800s but better in my opinion. Both amps have dead power tubes, one as of late and the other almost a year ago.
I don't always play my BE100, mostly the quickrod and desperately need new power tubes. I'm not exactly a tube pro but have had experience with a few popular choices like the EH 34 and the EH 6CA7 which happens to be my current favorite.
I'm planning on buying new tubes for both quickrods and was thinking of trying out the SED =c=. I'm actually considering swapping out the =c= out of the BE into a quickrod. My only concern is that I might like them and want to buy more. And boy are they expensive.
I really like the EH 6CA7s but at times feel like I'm getting too much roundness on the upper high end.
I feel like the =c= are a bit more snappier and it might help edge up the higher registers. I'm looking for a subtle change. This is just a thought and all subjective I know. I guess what I'm asking is the difference between the =c= and the 6CA7s and if any one has experience with SED winged =c=
Thanks!
I don't always play my BE100, mostly the quickrod and desperately need new power tubes. I'm not exactly a tube pro but have had experience with a few popular choices like the EH 34 and the EH 6CA7 which happens to be my current favorite.
I'm planning on buying new tubes for both quickrods and was thinking of trying out the SED =c=. I'm actually considering swapping out the =c= out of the BE into a quickrod. My only concern is that I might like them and want to buy more. And boy are they expensive.
I really like the EH 6CA7s but at times feel like I'm getting too much roundness on the upper high end.
I feel like the =c= are a bit more snappier and it might help edge up the higher registers. I'm looking for a subtle change. This is just a thought and all subjective I know. I guess what I'm asking is the difference between the =c= and the 6CA7s and if any one has experience with SED winged =c=
Thanks!