drdoom8793
THAT guy at Chick-fil-A
It's so....beautifullll.......:bawling:
This, for the most part.
I'm heading there in a couple of weeks on a long weekend road trip with the wife. Chicago to Lacrosse, Lacrosse to the Quad Cities (where I am originally from), and then back to Chicago. The intent of the trip was to get back to Dave's and make a hands on purchase. The trip has been planned for 3 months, or so. I've been looking at their inventory since January trying to decide on what to get. I agree with DHW that their stock is aging, but there are a ton of terrific pieces to pick from,at some great prices. As for them getting a lot of used, kind of. Since I've been watching, it appears that they are moving some of their "New" instruments to "Used." For example, when I started looking they had 4 new 408's in stock (this would have been January time frame). Sometime in March all 4 were gone from the "New" category, and were now listed in the "Used" category at a substantially reduced price. All 4 have subsequently sold. I assume they do this as their inventory depreciates to the point that it makes fiscal sense to reclassify. At least listed as "Used" they can decrease the price and move the gear at little easier. Whether they take a loss vs. cost is anyone's guess. In each instance that I've seen this, the Used gear condition is listed as EC+. Not saying that everything Used they have listed as EC+ was reclassified, just making an observation. You'd have to see something you want, and watch it for quite a length of time and see what happens (and hope someone doesn't snag it out from under you). Again, this is purely from an observational standpoint.
and yes, I will be dining at Buzzard Billies!
I preface this post by saying that I don't know Dave's policy...
It makes NO sense to reclassify any new but previous year's model to "used." If it is unsold, it is "new" and carries a new warranty no matter when it sells. The correct method is to classify them "new, old stock" (NOS). It is not necessary for anyone to classify something as "used" to decrease its price to make it move.
It is more likely that the 408s sold and were returned for one reason or another.
PRS has a policy that the MAP pricing must be used for all advertising for two or three years after initial release, I believe. I read the policy in-depth somewhere on the Interwebz, but don't remember where. I wouldn't be surprised if PRS waived the "Advertise at original MAP only" policy if the guitars are re-classified as "used - NOS". And perhaps Dave's feels that the guitars have been "sampled" enough that they no longer look perfectly 100% out of the box new, just "pretty darn close so we'll call it NOS Mint".
EDIT: found the policy - it was the last page of the 2015 price list, but I didn't see it in the version I just checked on the PRS website - I found it in the copy I downloaded a while back. Anyway, it says MAP must be applied to even "shop worn" products, and I think it says that MAP does not apply for two-years prior or discontinued models (it is a bit vague). Either way, I think Dave's could sell a 2012 or 2013 as "new" at whatever price they wanted, but it is much safer for them to re-classify as used.
Anyways, I can't believe PRS is actually letting dealers do this. Its very sketchy.
Well, as I mentioned, I don't think Dave's is actually doing anything against the PRS MAP policy even if they described the guitars as "new" - the guitars are not 2015 nor 2014 models, so the policy doesn't apply (as far as I interpret it - IANAL).
Oh, and it is possible Dave's negotiated with PRS so that they could sell these as "used" and eliminate the warranty, which saves PRS from having too much "Contingent Liabilities" to report financially - maybe PRS refunded Dave's half of their typical Warranty-related Contingent Liabilities for each specimen, and Dave's reduces their price accordingly. Despite what we all feel about these beasties, and how much we love discovering "NOS", they are just another product in a supply chain, and Old Stock is usually not useful for anyone. So PRS probably encourages such actions.
I totally agree, and many of us forget how good. Regarding White Castle however, you're better off not knowing!You Yankmericans have got it good.