ViperDoc
Plugged In.
HERE'S HOW IT ALL WORKS:
HERE'S HOW IT ALL WORKS:
Looks like splinters in places most of us wouldn't want them! (Yes, I say "most" because I've learned better than to speak for the whole group on matters such as this).That’s the worst looking chair I’ve ever seen.
Marquis de Sade doesn’t make chairs, but if he did.....That’s the worst looking chair I’ve ever seen.
Flat sawn at the back, quartersawn front left and radial sawn front right?HERE'S HOW IT ALL WORKS:
Slab sawn, back leftFlat sawn at the back, quartersawn front left and radial sawn front right?
I printed that out and framed it. I’ll go upstairs and take a picture of it on my nightstand for you.
The vertical lines are pretty wavy here, but still visible amongst all the other stuff going on.
Looks like an Escher staircase to meThat’s the worst looking chair I’ve ever seen.
The left hand side of the spalt reminds me of the fjordsThe vertical lines are pretty wavy here, but still visible amongst all the other stuff going on.
Flat sawn at the back, quartersawn front left and radial sawn front right?
You should try both. Game changer.I’m not really into wood. I’m into leather.
As you can see from my NUGDs post earlier this week, I really like the look of tops where prominent, generally vertical growth rings intersect with regular horizontal flame. The Santana in my avatar is a good example:
Two questions for you congnoscenti:
1) How persuaded are you that narrowly spaced growth rings, as in the Violin guitars, makes for an appreciable difference in maple-topped electric guitars?
2) Many of the select quilt tops on PS guitars show little evidence of growth rings: e.g., this stunning 594 on Brian's site:
http://briansguitars.com/product/paul-reed-smith-private-stock-mccarty-594-sub-zero-glow.
Am I correct that the process that creates quilting in the first place tends to minimize the growth rings?
And a third for the rest of us:
3) Do YOU like prominent growth rings and, if so, do you prefer them parallel to the neck, wavy or even circular?