Vision, Life, And Brevity

László

Master Of The Universe (Emeritus)
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
37,286
Location
Michigan
When I was in my impatient 30s and people would kvetch about this or that, I'd respond by saying, "Life is short, and then you die." What I meant of course was that in the context of the brevity of life, this or that little complaint didn't amount to much.

Of course, back then I didn't realize just how short life really is. I'm feelin' it a little more now that I'm older, with so much time that has whizzed by in a blur. You're young, you're full of whatever it is that makes you go, and then one day you look in the mirror and...hmmm...

You look at the accomplishments of visionaries and game-changers, and you really begin to realize how important they are, and what they were able to do with the short time we are allotted on this planet. As but one example, the world lost more than a computer guy when it lost Steve Jobs. It lost someone who had not only the vision, but the ability to coalesce people around his vision, and get the world to buy into it. That's a rare thing. Most of us don't have it, and can only glimpse it at a distance.

Often it takes a lifetime to really reach the top of one's game. Sometimes there are people who do it in their 20s, or earlier. Some get better and better at honing their vision with time.

To a greater or lesser degree, there are people like this in all walks of life, but in the world of instruments we know this dude...

I feel very good about being a PRS player for a lot of reasons.
 
Last edited:
[video]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I1G_Bzu52DY[/video]
 
.

Often it takes a lifetime to really reach the top of one's game. Sometimes there are people who do it in their 20s, or earlier. Some get better and better at honing their vision with time.

Just a side comment - Our culture does not value wisdom and experience the way that other cultures do. This has both positives and negatives. If you work at it, you can continue to grow as person & professionally into your 70's (at least I hope - only in my 60's now:p)
 
Yeah, it's a bit of a strange thing for sure. It's some of the reason that I've always struggled with my job. I've been here a long time. I can't afford to quit. At the same time I feel like I was meant to do something more. Not necessarily to the scope you speak of in the examples of Paul and Steve. They are visionaries and game changers. I think it's sometimes forgotten the general state of the musical instrument industry's quality prior to PRS coming into the scene. There were a lot of poorly made instruments being made. There was A LOT more searching for "the one"... the right guitar, a special guitar. You had to find one that was well built, which at times was a huge task. Then to find one that was "magic" was another story. Not to mention the beauty aspect. I believe PRS pretty much single handedly forced guitar makers to build better quality and better looking instruments. The guitar building industry today as whole builds better quality instruments. I balked a little when the SE line was first introduced. Aside from there being a market for the line, when I realized that the SE would be a great quality instrument, capable of pro use in a price range that most can afford, I was on board. Those who couldn't previously afford a great playing and great looking guitar, now could.
 
I don't think Paul started out being a visionary. I think he started with a great product and developed it into something revolutionary over time. I do think history will show PRS to be the game changer of the guitar industry (if it hasn't already).

That said, it isn't the game changers of the world that make it worth living. It is the steady anchors. Much of what the world is changing into is destructive. The steady anchors keep us grounded and make life worth living. The mothers and fathers of the world, the silent worker bees, keep life worth living and they get little recognition precisely because they don't upset the world. If you are a steady anchor, you have my gratitude.
 
Musicians have a big advantage over pro sports people in that they can go broke, blow up whatever but still make a comeback. I'm off to see fleetwood Mac tomorrow night. They are in their 70s and still able to pull a crowd. Amazing really. Off hand I can think of few other careers where a group of 70year olds can be so prominent. Even politicians tend to struggle around then
 
Musicians have a big advantage over pro sports people in that they can go broke, blow up whatever but still make a comeback. I'm off to see fleetwood Mac tomorrow night. They are in their 70s and still able to pull a crowd. Amazing really. Off hand I can think of few other careers where a group of 70year olds can be so prominent. Even politicians tend to struggle around then

I know plenty of lawyers in their 70s who go to court and are still heading up law firms. Not unusual here (having practiced law until 19990, a lot of my friends are lawyers). Lots of doctors, too.

But as you say, not many will draw a crowd of thousands of people. My brother and his wife went to see Paul McCartney the other night - I didn't hear about the tickets going on sale due to recent surgery a few months back - and they said the show was great, the crowd packed and excited.

Just a side comment - Our culture does not value wisdom and experience the way that other cultures do. This has both positives and negatives. If you work at it, you can continue to grow as person & professionally into your 70's (at least I hope - only in my 60's now:p)

My grandfather was an active real estate developer until he was 91, and he was a cool guy who really knew how to live. People loved him. So he was a great example of what you can do as you age gracefully!

Yeah, it's a bit of a strange thing for sure. It's some of the reason that I've always struggled with my job. I've been here a long time. I can't afford to quit. At the same time I feel like I was meant to do something more. Not necessarily to the scope you speak of in the examples of Paul and Steve. They are visionaries and game changers. I think it's sometimes forgotten the general state of the musical instrument industry's quality prior to PRS coming into the scene. There were a lot of poorly made instruments being made. There was A LOT more searching for "the one"... the right guitar, a special guitar. You had to find one that was well built, which at times was a huge task. Then to find one that was "magic" was another story. Not to mention the beauty aspect. I believe PRS pretty much single handedly forced guitar makers to build better quality and better looking instruments. The guitar building industry today as whole builds better quality instruments. I balked a little when the SE line was first introduced. Aside from there being a market for the line, when I realized that the SE would be a great quality instrument, capable of pro use in a price range that most can afford, I was on board. Those who couldn't previously afford a great playing and great looking guitar, now could.

So true, Vaughn! And you know, we all want to do more stuff at times -- that's the reason I got into music halfway through life, and left my law practice behind. Though it's not something I recommend for everyone, it has been a hell of an interesting ride!

That said, it isn't the game changers of the world that make it worth living. It is the steady anchors. Much of what the world is changing into is destructive.

You can be a game changer AND a steady anchor, but I don't disagree that both are needed, and in my humble opinion, the world must rely on BOTH. And some game-changers founded this country, or became philosophers, or invented the damned light bulb. Game changing is often very, very good.

As for what the world is changing into...in the middle ages your chances of being killed via violence were about ten times higher. In ancient times, higher still (yes, there have been studies on this). If your city was taken, you were dead meat, or enslaved. And there was brutal slavery on top of everything else for thousands of years. And debtors' workhouses later on. Not to mention plagues, witch hunts, burnings at the stake, and other abominations.

Every generation thinks the world is going to hell in a hand basket. Read some Roman history - Augustus tried to turn back the clock and restore "Roman values" to the empire with morals laws in 30 BC.

And think back only seventy years -- 50 MILLION people were killed in all the theaters of World War II. 50 MILLION people whose lives and stories and accomplishments vanished from the face of the earth, in only 6 years (1939-1945). The vast majority of the dead weren't soldiers, either. Tell me that the world has devolved from that carnage - you can't. It was ultra-violence, mass murder, rape and pillage on an incredibly vast, government-sanctioned, mechanized scale from Europe to Asia, to the Pacific region, to the shores of the US where ships were torpedoed for quite some time right on the gulf coast, to North Africa and you didn't want to be a Pole or a Jew or Ukranian, Belorussian, or Chinese for most of that time. Heck, at the end, you didn't want to be a German or Japanese. You just wanted it to stop.

And from 1934-1939, Stalin killed millions of his own people by purposeful starvation and purges. Estimates range as high as Fourteen Million people. The numbers are staggering, but they get blurred because the very same regions with most of the victims of Stalin were later invaded by, and victimized by Hitler.

Speaking of victims, how about the forced death marches that the Turkish government imposed on the Armenians in 1915? One million deaths at the very least. One million. Lost in the mists of time to most folks, because WWI was an allied victory, and that all got pushed under the armistice deal's rug.

I could go on. There have been bloodthirsty lunatics in the human race forever, and many of them ran governments. Pol Pot in Cambodia comes to mind.

So sure, things are changing, and some of the changes aren't good. But some of the changes aren't bad. In any case, there haven't been 50 million deaths in a 6 year period in most of our lifetimes. Our parents and grandparents (depending on your age) saw and experienced a hell that none of us ever will if we stay lucky.

I don't mean to lecture, but we constantly hear about how things are going south, when in fact, history has lessons to teach us, and to some degree, the human race seems to be on the verge of learning some of those lessons.

The problem is that life is so short that each generation forgets (or never knew about) the failings of the recent past, and how bad things can get. And then in times of peace, we look around and say, "Oh, things were better back then." Well, they weren't. In fact, it's not even close.

In any case, PRS is run by a game-changer whose work I appreciate.
 
Last edited:
I agree with everything you said Les, still I stand my the idea that much of what is changing today is destructive. I didn't mean to imply that we were somehow worse off than 1930's Russia or 1940's Europe. Indeed, as technology advances, our lives are easier and in that sense, better. What I do suggest is that political correctness is turning traditional values into traditional devalues. Freedoms are being fettered by the very institutions that used to defend them. And while it may be true that every generation decries the next as inferior, I am persuaded that what was a free country, be that good or bad, is now decidedly less so. In 2012 more than 40,000 new laws were enacted across the country. That was not an unusual year. There are so many laws on the books you probably violate one a week without knowing it. Other laws our government overtly refuses to uphold. I could go on, but I'll just say that these things, and more, are the things I refer to as destructive.
 
In 2012 more than 40,000 new laws were enacted across the country. That was not an unusual year. There are so many laws on the books you probably violate one a week without knowing it.

Well, you and I do agree on the question of the passage of too many laws; every interest group demands that this or that problem be solved with some new law. Find a problem? Pass a law against it. So we agree on that, for the most part, you don't solve problems merely by passing laws. Though sometimes you do.

However, to make sense out of your figure of 40,000 laws, you need much more information and a breakdown of exactly what laws were passed. For example, how many of the 40,000 new laws that were passed, were passed to replace laws with sunset provisions (laws that expire at a certain date)? How many of the laws that were passed actually were acts repealing older laws that were on the books? In order to repeal an Act of a legislature, a law gets passed. In order to modify or correct a law, a new law gets passed. A tremendous amount of legislative work is done relating simply to the correction of laws we already have.

How many were simply rezoning ordinances, parking ordinances, tax enactments, tax change enactments, or laws that relate to funding of things like road construction for a given municipality, county, state, or federal jurisdiction? Every state budget, every municipal budget, every county budget, and every federal budget is enacted into law. Every year a new law is passed in every state adopting the Federal definition of what is taxable income, etc. etc etc.

Without a complete breakdown of the types of laws that are passed, and the numbers relating to each type of law, simply saying that a given number of laws get passed is too amorphous to have real meaning. This is a big country with 50 state legislatures, thousands of counties, and tens of thousands of cities, townships, and other local governments. And in some areas with rapid growth, the laws on the books are incredibly out of date.

So let's say you wanted to repeal those 40,000 new laws. You'd pass 40,000 laws doing that alone. You can see why a blanket, overall number with no breakdown as to the who, what, why, when and where is meaningful.

It would be interesting to know the historical number of laws passed in relation to the population of the US and the number of states and communities - I think that's pretty important, since growing populations require new cities and living places and local law enactments - over the years. It'd be an interesting study.

Many states have hundreds of communities that didn't exist when I was born.

In any case honestly, this has very little to do with a thread on the shortness of our lives, and the people who accomplish a lot within their time on the planet.
 
Last edited:
Thought provoking and very relevant comments Les. My son came back from college last week and I realized, wow where did the time go. After 30, life seemed to shift into hyper drive. I got the double whammy of now working in a fairly young company as an older gent and see the generation gap first hand. Nothing short of culture shock. Had a great run for a long time, took some mental health time and now back into the work force realizing the speed at which business changed in two years was nothing short of amazing.
 
Thought provoking and very relevant comments Les. My son came back from college last week and I realized, wow where did the time go. After 30, life seemed to shift into hyper drive. I got the double whammy of now working in a fairly young company as an older gent and see the generation gap first hand. Nothing short of culture shock. Had a great run for a long time, took some mental health time and now back into the work force realizing the speed at which business changed in two years was nothing short of amazing.

It really is culture shock, isn't it?

When I hang with my kids - who I get along with really well - I can see that it's quickly becoming a different world. The good thing about being a composer is that at least I do stay on top of current music trends and technology, so I can relate to the creative needs of younger folks. But it's a challenge!

And the pace of change seems faster. Though, it must have also seemed fast for my grandfather, who was born into the horse and buggy era, 1891, and after seeing men land on the moon, lived to see the birth of the personal computer.

It's probably always been like this, but it doesn't feel like it to me! It feels like time has zoomed by at warp speed!
 
Last edited:
It feels like time has zoomed by at warp speed!

Hindsight is always like that, I remember black & white TV, rotary phones, and worked on computers that used punch cards. It's even moving faster now but like you said, being musical helps you keep in touch somewhat. I'm not a fan of what rock has become over the past decade or two but I'm at least aware of what my 13 yr old listens to and freak her out when I ape one of her favorite songs. At least she smiles and sings along.

Yeah we're getting up there but that PRS will keep you feeling brand new, keep plucking Les.
 
Living comes much easier once we admit we're dying...

It's all just folly anyways. Mother Earth will renew herself long after we're all gone and done raping and pillaging her.

Life is short. .try to enjoy it while you can
 
I don't disagree. Pretty sure Paul started as a guy who wanted to build guitars(obviously). He did so out of necessity for a quality guitar he couldn't afford. But even early on in the company, he seemed to have a drive to do something that hadn't been done. At least not successfully or to his standards. He wanted a guitar to cover more bases. Qualities of G and F. So people didn't feel the need to switch guitars. He certainly had the desire for consistency and continuing improvement throughout the entire history of the company. That's what set PRS apart IMO. That and some great playing, feeling, looking and sounding guitars. :)

I'm certainly a steady individual. Definitely anchor like. But I also have qualities that are being wasted at my place of employment. It's up to me to try to change that though. Like I said, I don't need to be a game changer. It's not something I want. I just want something more, to better my situation and be happier.
I don't think Paul started out being a visionary. I think he started with a great product and developed it into something revolutionary over time. I do think history will show PRS to be the game changer of the guitar industry (if it hasn't already).

That said, it isn't the game changers of the world that make it worth living. It is the steady anchors. Much of what the world is changing into is destructive. The steady anchors keep us grounded and make life worth living. The mothers and fathers of the world, the silent worker bees, keep life worth living and they get little recognition precisely because they don't upset the world. If you are a steady anchor, you have my gratitude.
 
I'm certainly a steady individual. Definitely anchor like. But I also have qualities that are being wasted at my place of employment. It's up to me to try to change that though. Like I said, I don't need to be a game changer. It's not something I want. I just want something more, to better my situation and be happier.

Well, like most folks, I'm no game-changer either. I'm more of a steady kind of person, too.

What we do for a living is so time consuming and important, though - you gotta be happy at it or life can be less than enjoyable. I know how you feel!
 
And you know, we all want to do more stuff at times -- that's the reason I got into music halfway through life, and left my law practice behind.

I'm thinking about quitting music and becoming a lawyer. I want to do more paying for stuff.
 
I'm thinking about quitting music and becoming a lawyer. I want to do more paying for stuff.

The smart move - one I didn't make, incidentally - is to simply marry someone who is very rich.

Better lifestyle, more fun, more champagne.
 
Back
Top