The PRS web site says that the HXDA 50 is 100 watts, switchable to 50. Is that wrong? Or new?
Since you switched from the 50 to the 30 I guess you don't think the master volume on the HXDA does a good enough job of keeping the sound you want while lowering the volume? Is there another way to deal with it?
My HXDA 50 was bought not long after they first came out. It was only 50 watts, not switchable to anything else. So I don't know if the new ones are, or not. At the time they did have a 100 watt HXDA, but I don't know if it was switchable. I'd call PRS and ask.
I switched from the 50 to the 30 thinking it'd be a bit easier to control for recording with a smaller speaker cab. It does produce less of a low-end roar, and so maybe t's a little bit easier to record, but at the same time, there's a tone tradeoff. That low frequency thing also gave the amp some extra syrupy, buttery sauce.
Do I miss that? Certainly! Where do I hear an advantage with the 30? It's a little easier to get mic levels for crunchy chords, etc. Where was the advantage with the 50? It sounded a little richer for solos.
The 50 had a
terrific master volume. So I didn't really need to make the switch! Of course, these are hand wired amps, and each one sounds a little bit different, anyway. And tubes matter. Sticking an NOS Mullard 12AX7 in the V1 made a sweet difference with the HXDA30.
Still, I had a hankering to try the 30, and that's what I did. It's a keeper. So is the 50, but I didn't keep it. My loss. If I'd used my head, I'd have both now, and be switching between them to get different tones for various things.
In a way, the idea that I could make the switch from the 50 to the 30, and everything would be pretty much the same, but with lower volume, is one of the incorrect ideas that inspired this thread.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE my HXDA 30. The 30 is its own beast, with its own kind of tone.
But I do miss the 50.