Santana SE observations and possible mods

toneaholic

New Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
4
Hi. I bought a santana SE a few weeks back and I've already done a boatload of tweaks in trying to change something about the tone i'm not real thrilled about. I love the guitar in ever other way, and i do like the tone in some respects. But it's just not what i had hoped for and i wanted to talk about it and see what others think. So i figured the best place to do so is a forum for PRS, and here i am.

So heres the issue i have with it. The low strings are much deader sounding than the plains. It's a pretty nite and day difference. The low strings have no attack to speak of, no crispness at all and are really dull sounding till you get a lot of bright gain going . Yet the plain strings are quite bright. There is also a very pronounced middiness to the tone, apparently PRS' attempt to get the signature tone of Carlos. In an attempt to try and change the tone into a more transparent open chimier thing I tried all the following things. I adjusted the bridge every way imaginable, decked, floating, various heights. Tried import spaced callaham strat saddles. Tried decked with strat mounting screws. And yes, i do understand about the notched screws and that they must be exactly the same height and adjusted only with no string/spring tension. Tried 4 different pickups, some A5, and no matter how different it always retained the "issue" i have with it. Also adjusted them ad nausium. As for wiring, i put a little bigger treble bleed in it, as 250pf, and the tone control is disconnected.

I have many years of tweaking and modding/building behind me, so i think i'm pretty good at determining whats causing a certain tone and whether it can be changed. At this point you don't even need that experience because i pretty much tried everything but changing the entire bridge. But the only ones available are brass which in my experience would do just the opposite of what i want. On the other hand, if it's NOT the bridge, then it must be in the design itself. The scale maybe? I don't know what to think at this point. I've helped it quite a bit recently by adjusting the pickup screws on the wound string for more brightness and to get more tone from one coil rather than both. That and a set of very low output PAF type pickups with A5 also helped. But still the issue remains. Better, but still enough to have me constantly consider selling it. But i really don't want to resort to that being otherwise one of my favorite guitars i've bought in a very long time.

So i expect no one will have an answer, and i didn't necassarily post here to get one. More to just see what others who own one think. Whether they also notice this "issue" and any thoughts they have as to what might be the cause. I understand that Santana's sound is what they were going for, so it mkes sense that it sounds like this. But what i don't understand is that i see nothing in the parts or design that seems like it would so radically change the tone of a otherwise classic design of set neck mahogany with maple cap and rosewood board. The trem is the big difference. But do the other PRS 24.5" scale guitars with a trem sound the same?
 
You should PM our member "Dazco" he is going through the exact same thing as you, and when I say exact I mean exact. Unless of course you are him with two accounts here.
 
I had a similar issue when I bought my SE Santana and one I modded everything about it but the wood and frets, it became a keeper.

• Phase II tuners
• PRS "Core" nut
•McSwitching drop in kit
• "Core" Trem from a 408 w/ Mann saddles
• Older Mira pickups
• New "Core" Jack assembly
• Pure Nickel Strings makes a big difference on that particular scale length and those pups for me

Now, the guitar is extremely versatile. Has tons of snap when coil tapped and has a clarity and openness it lacked at first.

You migh try those new Cobalt strings by Ernie Ball. My son swears by them. I am not a fan but don't like overly bright tone as is evident by the Pure Nickels I employ...

Keep us posted please.
 
Thanks for that. I changed the nut too, tho not a PRS but a bone from scratch. Really improved tone a bit tho nothing along the lines of changing it as i'm looking to do. From the things you did the only 2 that may matter that i haven't done is the bridge and strings. My experience with strings is that no string is likely to do nearly what i want to accomplish. But the bridge is the one thing left. But like i said, i'm not sure i can risk that much on something that may well not help achieve what i'm trying to. The pickup maybe, but as many as i've tried so far and none changed that tone issue at all it seems unlikely at this point. Let me ask you this tho. Which of the changes you made do you attribute the change to, and did you also feel the same as I do about the wound strings being muddy and inarticulate ?

I had a similar issue when I bought my SE Santana and one I modded everything about it but the wood and frets, it became a keeper.

• Phase II tuners
• PRS "Core" nut
•McSwitching drop in kit
• "Core" Trem from a 408 w/ Mann saddles
• Older Mira pickups
• New "Core" Jack assembly
• Pure Nickel Strings makes a big difference on that particular scale length and those pups for me

Now, the guitar is extremely versatile. Has tons of snap when coil tapped and has a clarity and openness it lacked at first.

You migh try those new Cobalt strings by Ernie Ball. My son swears by them. I am not a fan but don't like overly bright tone as is evident by the Pure Nickels I employ...

Keep us posted please.
 
I felt the stock guitar lacked a little definition, absolutely. The biggest changes came from the brass block Core Trem and the saddles the strings now ride in on.

The actual string change just have me a more mellow "round" tone without the muddiness I try to avoid. In the SE Santana, the Mira pups tend to be very twangy sounding. Very much Tele-like. I was not a fan of those particular pickups in any other guitar to be perfectly honest.

I had previously tried a McCarty set and Dragon 1 in the treble position with a DiMarzio 36th Anniversary PAF in the neck. That was a great setup but just not what I wanted from the guitar.

You would be surprised what a new bridge alone can do for an SE model. They are good guitars to begin with which can be made superb with a little time, love and patience...
 
Thats what i figured, gotta be the bridge. But I just couldn't wrap my head around the possibility that brass could change the wound strings from mud to chime. It's usually steel that would take it in that direction and brass that would do the opposite. But if thats what did it for you i guess i need to rethink this. I wonder f the block alone would do the trick. I know that man made is going to release one soon that will fit the SE. Might be the way to go and a lot cheaper. Saddles i'm not so sure because like i said i tried callaham saddles and they did nothing to change it in the direction i need to go. And those are extremely bright saddles. So the block may be where it's at. Certainly is with strats, as i have tried complete callaham trems, callaham trem with fender saddles, and callaham block only. And it was the block that mattered.

I felt the stock guitar lacked a little definition, absolutely. The biggest changes came from the brass block Core Trem and the saddles the strings now ride in on.

The actual string change just have me a more mellow "round" tone without the muddiness I try to avoid. In the SE Santana, the Mira pups tend to be very twangy sounding. Very much Tele-like. I was not a fan of those particular pickups in any other guitar to be perfectly honest.

I had previously tried a McCarty set and Dragon 1 in the treble position with a DiMarzio 36th Anniversary PAF in the neck. That was a great setup but just not what I wanted from the guitar.

You would be surprised what a new bridge alone can do for an SE model. They are good guitars to begin with which can be made superb with a little time, love and patience...
 
If you don't want to swap the whole bridge, John Mann is introducing brass sustain blocks that will fit the SE trem. Haven't seen pricing yet, but that may be a simpler way to try the brass thing out...

Good luck!
 
Time to sell it and move on.

If you're determined, the Mann block/saddles or whole trem is the way to go. Afterall, that's the original bridge that would've been on Carlos's guitar. If the guitar still doesn't work out for you, sell it and keep the Mann stuff for the next one.
 
If you don't want to swap the whole bridge, John Mann is introducing brass sustain blocks that will fit the SE trem. Haven't seen pricing yet, but that may be a simpler way to try the brass thing out...

Good luck!

Sounds good if the price is right. I found one company making them but it was $125 and i'm not going that high on principle alone. Thats double what callaham charges for a strat block.
 
I ran into the same problem with my Santana SE.
I changed the saddles and six screws to mann made. -small difference.
Pots to 550k volume 500k tone small difference.
PRS USA Nut- better yet.

Pickups to Manlius Hot rod neck in bridge position A5 mag 7.8K

And a Manlius T-top neck 7.4K short A5 magnet.

Pickups helped but still it should be stellar by now.

Mann brass block before I burned this dam guitar and low and behold- Clarity, detail in notes I was after.

At this pointy I'd put up against anything! including a USA model.

Dam block really opened up the sound alot more then i thought it would.

Now i just play it and enjoy.

Oh also Grover 406c tuners. stays in tune even with heavy trem use.
 
Back
Top