Random PRS collection statistics that are, well... meaningless, really.

Going Modal

I should be practicing right now.
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
1,533
Location
Your mom.
I don't know why this would matter at all, but I decided it'd be fun to calculate the average and the median age (manufacture-years, as per their serial numbers) of my *ahem* several PRS guitars:
• Average year of manufacture is: 2007
• Median year of manufacture is: 2009

So what does this mean? Absolutely nothing.

images


Although... I do think that roughly 2007~2009 was an inflection point of when PRS guitars really hit their stride and transitioned from already-great guitars to insanely-well-crafted resonant instruments of sonic wonder. IDK what the heck kind of wizardry in which Paul was partaking during that time, but it just took things to a whole new level (the " / " series pickups, Modern Eagles, etc.).
 
Fun perspective @Going Modal. My oldest PRS is a 2016, with the average production year ~2021. This gives me a very limited perspective though I often wonder if I am missing anything with the older guitars. I tell myself that Paul is always going forward and thus the newer ones should be more than adequate to cover the ground of the older guitars. For me, the 2018-2021 McCarty 594's and Tremonti's are so close to perfect, it is hard for me to justify working too hard to get a more vintage PRS.
 
Fun perspective @Going Modal. My oldest PRS is a 2016, with the average production year ~2021. This gives me a very limited perspective though I often wonder if I am missing anything with the older guitars. I tell myself that Paul is always going forward and thus the newer ones should be more than adequate to cover the ground of the older guitars. For me, the 2018-2021 McCarty 594's and Tremonti's are so close to perfect, it is hard for me to justify working too hard to get a more vintage PRS.
There isn’t really a reason to chase anything older.
 
Lot of love for the late zeros and early tens I see.

My mean and median arw both 2009. Four guitars, one 2007, two 2009 and one 2011. I dunno if they were the knees bees, but I love mine. It is also a matter of what I could afford, but I do not really feel tempted to buy "newer" ones.
 
Statistics was part of my university curriculum, planning, executing, evaluating polls.

Evaluation #1, Stevensville production only
Average: 2008
Median: 2008
Minimum: 2005
Maximum 2011
Sample quantity: 2

Evaluation #2, abroad production only
Average: 2016
Median: 2016
Min/Max: 2016
Sample quantity: 1

Evaluation #3, Stevensville and abroad production:
Average: 2010.8888
Median: 2011
Minimum: 2005
Maximum: 2016
Sample quantity: 3

Rules: Sample quantity equal and higher than n = 30 allows deductive conclusions with scientific claim. To state rules to draw on the normal population is appropriate.

Sample quantity below n = 30 allow inductive conclusions. To draw those conclusions on the normal population is not scientific, because n = 30 is a single observation, which is not assess to be exact enough.
Additionally the descripted actual mimimum and maximum are cut off.

Thereby:
Evaluation #1 didn't occur. The same with evaluation #2. Remaining is the year 2011 though.

2011 I bought my first really six string, um, my first PRS.
 
I’m a fan of anything from the late 90’s thru 2012. 06-09 is where most of my core PRS’s fall into. after 2012, I’ll pass on everything.
 
Rules: Sample quantity equal and higher than n = 30 allows deductive conclusions with scientific claim. To state rules to draw on the normal population is appropriate.

Sample quantity below n = 30 allow inductive conclusions. To draw those conclusions on the normal population is not scientific, because n = 30 is a single observation, which is not assess to be exact enough.
Additionally the descripted actual mimimum and maximum are cut off.
We'll wait a while and get someone to use the thread as a cohort. lol
 
Back
Top