Joe, when you are manufacturing an item, there are a huge number of considerations in making it right. The starting points are the cost of labor and materials. You work up from there, sourcing parts, paint, factory, reputation of builder, etc. The goal is to come in at a target price point, which hopefully marketing has provided correctly for you. You then work towards that goal. If you have a better product, you’ll get a market share, a fine reputation, and lesser manufacturers will try anything (like a lawsuit in a friendly home court) to stop you. If you quit trying to improve, you start sliding and depend on the gullibility of the buyers to support your inferior product.
By definition, there will always be issues with mass production, no matter how careful you are. The question is, what does the manufacturer do to fix the problem? These days, people expect old fashion service and quality without putting in the buyer effort. We should always research what we buy, and give the manufacturer a chance to fix the problem. Going on line and saying something sucks is great for 10 year olds, although I would have strangled my kids if they didn’t approach business as adults. No manufacturer, especially PRS, will intentionally build something to induce you to buy “better”. If you like the quality of a $100 product, you should love a better product. That was the rationale of the old “good, better, best” that Sears, Montgomery Wards, and other retailers used to use on their catalog selling. Not every one can afford a $3,000 dollar guitar. As you know, a PRS SE Hollowbody smokes everything else at that price level, and is an instrument you can gig with for the rest of your life professionally. The goal is the best possible when you weigh all the factors.