Impossible? I Like All The Neck Profiles

Discussion in 'Electric Instruments' started by LSchefman, Mar 19, 2014.

  1. LSchefman

    LSchefman Hears Tones

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    24,381
    While being as ancient as I am has many disadvantages (for example, I am now completely invisible to women), maybe there's a silver lining to this cloud: I seem to have learned to be OK with an unusual variety of guitar neck profiles. Or was I born this way? Nature or nurture?

    I learned to play on a '65 SG Special with a Slim-Taper neck profile that I've mentioned here before. I've had deep V Martins, C-shaped Fenders, V-shaped Fenders, very fat necks, very thin necks, Taylors and Collings and skinny-as-hell Rick 12 string necks and many more; since 1991, I've owned all of the PRS neck shapes except Wide-Thin, though I now have a Pattern Thin 408 in my small arsenal. All of 'em worked just fine for me. Heck, I've owned a Modulus Graphite bass with a 35 inch scale and a neck so wide that you could land a 747 on it.

    What I've found is that while a good setup is absolutely vital, the neck profile is something I get used to in about a half a second.

    Since this seems impossible given the many posts I read where folks say they can't get along with one or the other neck profiles, I thought, "Maybe there's something unusual about my hands?" So I looked up a couple of facts. The length of the average adult male hand is 7.44 inches. Mine measures about 8, but it's by no means unusually large. It's a little wider, but not by much (and no jokes about size and girth please, ahem).

    So maybe on the larger than average size, but I know a lot of musicians whose hands are larger than mine. And with somewhat larger than average hands, shouldn't I have a problem with a shallower neck? I don't! Nor do I have a problem with a deeper neck. In fact, I hardly notice the difference! This led me to a discovery about myself: size doesn't matter!

    In fact, my friends, I am multineckadextrous!

    While it is true that I may be a freak of nature, I think it's a blessing. Hand me a guitar, and I will be able to play it as badly as I play any other guitar, provided it has a decent setup!

    So, am I alone on this board? Is anyone else multineckadextrous? Or are you all wimpily wedded to one singular sensational shape?

    Inquiring minds want to know the answer to this burning question. ;)
     
    #1 LSchefman, Mar 19, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2014
  2. bluefade

    bluefade New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    147
    HOW OLD ARE YOU ?
     
  3. LSchefman

    LSchefman Hears Tones

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    24,381
    Let's put it this way; the Romans were still using the ab urbe condita calendar, the Julian calendar had yet to be invented, let alone the Gregorian.

    So no one knows for sure.
     
  4. tbs7duke

    tbs7duke Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2014
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm in your camp my man. Each neck has its own quality and beauty about it. I get along fine with all of them and they seem to get along fine with me
     
  5. Musician78

    Musician78 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wide thin or pattern thin for me. I have small girly hands, for the record.
     
  6. SausageofPower

    SausageofPower New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think age necessarily has anything to do with it. I'm 30 and I get along fine with just about any neck profile. As a matter of fact, I'd hate to limit myself to one because then it'd be like having multiples of the same guitar to a degree. Sure, I prefer certain neck profiles (my favorite varies between the PRS wide-thin and the ESP George Lynch U profile), but I have all sorts and play them all equally badly. ;)
     
  7. alantig

    alantig Zombie Four, DFZ

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,995
    Likes Received:
    18,330
    A friend once described my hands as "Billy Barty hands". But all of the PRS neck profiles work for me. About the only thing I can't tolerate is a really fat neck.
     
  8. LSchefman

    LSchefman Hears Tones

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    24,381
    Then multineckadexterity must be nature, not nurture.

    But I'll bet you're not invisible to women yet.

    As a person with a really fat neck, I can't tell you how hurt I am by that remark.

    If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh?

    Time for me to see the neckadontist.
     
    #8 LSchefman, Mar 19, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2014
  9. Egads

    Egads One, Two, THIRTEEN!

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    I'm with you, Les. I get along with any neck profile. The only neck I haven't liked is the 12 string "way too narrow" Ric neck. On a 6 string, no prob.

    On a related note, I just played one of those Washburn historic series small bodied blues acoustics. It had a super narrow, but super sharp v neck. I mean, the v came to a point. You could crease paper on that sucker!
     
  10. Bluesboy998

    Bluesboy998 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    11
    Iam with you les neck size doesn't matter hell at my age Iam happy to get my hands around something
     
  11. AP515

    AP515 Mostly Normal

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,649
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    I'm happy with most any neck that isn't stuck to a Tele. Not that I wouldn't like one, I just haven't found one that works for me. Not sure why.
     
  12. TheRockGuitarGuy

    TheRockGuitarGuy New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2013
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    2
    I, too, can get along with most neck shapes/sizes. Now I know why - because I'm multineckadextrous! Great post!
     
  13. veinbuster

    veinbuster Zombie Three, DFZ

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    18,177
    The neck doesn't impact me much, except that I find it difficult to play classical music on a very narrow neck.
     
  14. Whitecat

    Whitecat Goes home to Starla

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    313
    Don't like wide-thin/pattern thin but doesn't mean I can't play on it, it just feels odd/like there's some neck missing and they wouldn't be my first choice. The other two I find interchangeable (not from a feel perspective but that I am equally at home on both). So two out of three ain't bad, amaright?

    What's pissing me off lately is that there's an influx of pattern thin necks at UK dealers. Even a recent fairly large Custom 22 order by a well-known retailer seemed to all have the P/T optional necks on them. I guess it's popular, but it's keeping me away. Oh wait, that's a good thing, says my wife. ;)
     
  15. Woollymonster

    Woollymonster New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    I’ll Take a Large

    I can play them all but vastly prefer wide fat necks. They are just more comfortable for my large hands. My fret hand tends to fatigue sooner on a thin skimpy neck. Plus wider necks allow me to get my fat fingers into the chords more cleanly. My ’51 Nocaster, ’58 LP R8, and PRS ME have the most comfortable profiles for me. I have and play a Strat with a thin, narrow mid 60’s neck but much prefer the others.

    I never understood thin necks except maybe for people with smaller hands. A thin neck does not add any speed for me. I also believe that more mass in the neck contribute to things like wood stability, tone, and sustain. I have actually sold a few nice guitars over the years because the necks were too thin for my taste.

    But in the end it is just a personal preference.
     
  16. andy474x

    andy474x Knows the Drill

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,892
    Likes Received:
    3,219
    I'm going to dispute this term before it gets added to the dictionary - I propose ambineckstrous!

    Ha.

    But seriously, I've not felt a PRS neck I didn't like. Have played some Gibsons that were too big, and a Ric that had a really deep "D" shaped neck that I didn't care for at all. And I also haven't found a Tele neck that I like.
     
  17. LSchefman

    LSchefman Hears Tones

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    24,381
    I've usually preferred larger necks, too.

    I can't say whether the Pattern Thin neck on my new 408 is faster than the one on my former Sig Ltd. It's very comfortable, but so was the Pattern.

    I don't notice a difference in tone or sustain between the two neck profiles on the two guitars.

    Maybe in theory I'd get something a bit different, but two guitars is too small a sample size for me to reach any conclusion about differences in tone between the two profiles.
     
  18. Felix

    Felix New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have had a guitar for about the last 25 years or so, and just recently took a random orbital sander to the neck -followed by careful hand-sanding to complete smoothness and a contour I like- and immediately fell in love with it all over again. I learned on a Squier HM-3 Strat, if anyone knows what that is. One of its characteristics is a very thin, fairly wide, flat fretboard. My second guitar (the one I sanded) was almost unplayable to me for several months after I got it simply because its neck had a slightly thicker, more nearly U-shaped (squarish) profile; now it is a decent approximation of the shape of a PRS wide-Fat neck, and much more playable. Oh, I got used to the original neck profile in time, but was never quite comfortable with it.

    I have a Pattern-necked PRS as well as a Wide-Fat; I find the Pattern-necked machine's neck's slight "V" a bit disconcerting -esp. at first- but it is also useful for the extra leverage it can give me in certain positions; I find the difference helpful overall if a bit odd-feeling compared to what I'm used to, but the difference is so slight as to be fairly easy to adapt to; I like it, all in all. So, a plus for the Wide-Fat for being so flipping comfortable, and a plus to the Pattern neck for being a useful adaptation.

    As for the question, is it unusual to be so comfortable with such widely varying neck profiles, I think that you are at the far end of the adaptability scale in that regard, whether through native talent, training, experience, or some other factor. Count yourself lucky... or skilled.
     
    #18 Felix, Mar 19, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2014
  19. Tag

    Tag New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    851
    Hey Les,

    You are very lucky, and I urge you not to think about it anymore! For 10 years or more, I was exactly the same way. Unless a neck was really thin and made the strings really close together, I could adjust to anything in seconds. I never even NOTICED or thought about the neck/shape/size. Thanks to the internet, I started paying much more attention to these things, and now i am useless on a thin neck. (probably because I am older, I now DO get cramping much fatser on a smaller neck) I also do feel for the most part (not always) larger necks sound better (woodier and meatier) than the same guitar with a smaller neck. Good for you though, the less you think about things, the better you play. The best guitars and amps you do not even notice IMO. They just get out of your way, and add zero resistance to the thought/note production signal path.
     
  20. LSchefman

    LSchefman Hears Tones

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    25,397
    Likes Received:
    24,381
    I think partly it's that I play with a pretty light touch. So my hands don't cramp. And I also spend a lot of time on keyboards, so maybe the "cross training" keeps the fingers limber. Who knows?

    As one of our forum members remarks, these are first-world problems! ;)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice