Horsemeat

gush

Where is that speedo pic
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
7,068
Location
washington iowa
Picked up a used Horsemeat pedal. Found a great deal on a used one. I'd buy a new one but my relationship with dirt pedals is shakey BUT the enablers on this stupid forum have coerced me into ANOTHER piece of gear.........I just hate this place





Naw........I love this place...just hate the enablers......




Naw.......I love the enablers
 
I'm sure I don't have enough weight to be an influencer around here. Enabler is probably a stretch as well. But I think the Horse Feet is a great addition to those who do OR don't like pedals. It can be a "more" pedal. It can be a "fine tuning" pedal, if you just want a bit more gain, or to shift the focus point a bit. It can be a great solo boost pedal, especially since you can tone the frequency range of the boost. It's clear (transparent), versatile, great sounding pedal that is pretty much a "must have" for most people.
 
It takes time for the newer guys to figure out just who "those" are. Although they probably figure out pretty quickly that I don't. :D
See............this BS right here is EXACTLY what I'm talking about!

Oh I don't know enough to be an influencer or enabler.......
I call TOTAL BS............that is exactly what an influencer or enabler would say!
 
But I think the Horse Feet is a great addition to those who do OR don't like pedals. It can be a "more" pedal. It can be a "fine tuning" pedal, if you just want a bit more gain, or to shift the focus point a bit. It can be a great solo boost pedal, especially since you can tone the frequency range of the boost. It's clear (transparent), versatile, great sounding pedal that is pretty much a "must have" for most people.

I wouldn't call this enabling, just a good discussion of the pedal's capabilities. A most excellent and succinct review of the pedal, I must say!

I haven't had the pleasure of trying one yet, but to recognize that there are pedals that can color the sound without dominating it, or dominating if that's what you want, well, that's a good observation.
 
Rabbit Hole Journey Number 194,200:

Folks don't love the name 'horsemeat' perhaps because the genuine article sounds so unpalatable and weird.

But here's a little-known historical tidbit about a 20th Century war, horses and meat.

People think that WWII armies were mechanized. Not the German Army. They used more horses from 1939-45 than Napoleon did in the early 19th century. And the name Blitzkrieg notwithstanding, they traveled through Russia more slowly than Napoleon as well. Most of the big guns were moved by horse-power, as well as food and supplies.

In total, the German military employed well over two million horses and mules on the Eastern Front. At any given time (including the campaigns in the West), they had 1.1 million horses in service. Hundreds of thousands of horses were shot or blown up in action, died of exertion and lack of fodder, especially during the Russian winter, and had to be replaced.

And...there were times the Landsers couldn't get food.

In such cases the horses served two purposes.

Horsemeat was a big one.

"That's kind of disgusting, pal."

"Yeah, but it's true. Never turn your nose up at horsemeat. One day it might save your sorry ass."

One last thought, this one about our ancient ancestors:

Until people learned how to harness and ride horses in the Bronze Age, they were bred for food. Like cattle.
 
Last edited:
Rabbit Hole Addenda:

Let's not feel too badly for the horses the German Army ate in WW2. There were 5.3 million human being German military deaths that include nearly a million from conscripts in conquered territory.

27 million human being Russian civilians and soldiers were killed. This figure includes almost 9 million human being soldiers killed.

I don't know how many of these human beings were eaten. Russian prisoners of war were starved to death (2 of the 3.3 million that were taken prisoner died of hunger or starvation-related diseases), as were about a million residents of Leningrad during the siege, and it is known from Russian records that certain of the dead became food.

WW2 consumed between 50 and 60 million human being deaths. Some figures, such as deaths in China, Korea and Indochina, can only be estimated because there were too many to keep track of.

A few Japanese soldiers were known to eat certain parts of enemies they killed, regardless of whether they were hungry. That's pretty weird. The whole thing is pretty weird.

There's no glory in war.
 
Last edited:
Rabbit Hole Journey Number 194,200:

Folks don't love the name 'horsemeat' perhaps because the genuine article sounds so unpalatable and weird.

But here's a little-known historical tidbit about a 20th Century war, horses and meat.

People think that WWII armies were mechanized. Not the German Army. They used more horses from 1939-45 than Napoleon did in the early 19th century. And the name Blitzkrieg notwithstanding, they traveled through Russia more slowly than Napoleon as well. Most of the big guns were moved by horse-power, as well as food and supplies.

In total, the German military employed well over two million horses and mules on the Eastern Front. At any given time (including the campaigns in the West), they had 1.1 million horses in service. Hundreds of thousands of horses were shot or blown up in action, died of exertion and lack of fodder, especially during the Russian winter, and had to be replaced.

And...there were times the Landsers couldn't get food.

In such cases the horses served two purposes.

Horsemeat was a big one.

"That's kind of disgusting, pal."

"Yeah, but it's true. Never turn your nose up at horsemeat. One day it might save your sorry ass."

One last thought, this one about our ancient ancestors:

Until people learned how to harness and ride horses in the Bronze Age, they were bred for food. Like cattle.

Rabbit Hole Addenda:

Let's not feel too badly for the horses the German Army ate in WW2. There were 5.3 million human being German military deaths that include nearly a million from conscripts in conquered territory.

27 million human being Russian civilians and soldiers were killed. This figure includes almost 9 million human being soldiers killed.

I don't know how many of these human beings were eaten. Russian prisoners of war were starved to death (2 of the 3.3 million that were taken prisoner died of hunger or starvation-related diseases), as were about a million residents of Leningrad during the siege, and it is known from Russian records that certain of the dead became food.

WW2 consumed between 50 and 60 million human being deaths. Some figures, such as deaths in China, Korea and Indochina, can only be estimated because there were too many to keep track of.

A few Japanese soldiers were known to eat certain parts of enemies they killed, regardless of whether they were hungry. That's pretty weird. The whole thing is pretty weird.

There's no glory in war.

Well, there it is... anyone can give a pedal a nauseating name, but only @László can make it romantic.




(seriously, though, good history tidbit)
 
Back
Top