Actually, it's part of trademark law, not copyright law. The test is whether the design is so substantially similar that it would cause confusion in the marketplace.It would fall under copyright law and not even close, IMO.
Symmetrical vs assymetrical tuners for one...
I stand corrected.Actually, it's part of trademark law, not copyright law. The test is whether the design is so substantially similar that it would cause confusion in the marketplace.
Copyright law applies to written works, works of the performing arts like music, works of visual art, films, etc.
It can be very, very confusing.I stand corrected.
Thanks for clarifying the details. I don't know much about it.Actually, it's part of trademark law, not copyright law. The test is whether the design is so substantially similar that it would cause confusion in the marketplace.
Copyright law applies to written works, works of the performing arts like music, works of visual art, films, etc.
Maybe about as similar as an Explorer and Kramer. A Strat?There is no way anyone is gonna mistake that for a PRS headstock.
They are about as similar as a Stratocaster and an Explorer headstock.
Sure is...It can be very, very confusing.
Looks like it.Silver Sky headstock?
That's pretty interesting! Normally this stuff comes under the purview of trademarks, such as this one registered by PRS:
If you're a tech nerd, a search on PRS patents is pretty cool.That's pretty interesting! Normally this stuff comes under the purview of trademarks, such as this one registered by PRS:
Trademark of Paul Reed Smith Guitars, Limited Partnership - Registration Number 3018560 - Serial Number 78330369 :: Justia Trademarks
Musical instruments, namely, guitars and basses [ and parts, ] fittings, and accessories therefore, namely, [ tuning pegs, ] straps [ and picks ]trademarks.justia.com
I guess PRS wants to cover all possible bases. But I honestly didn't think the patent office accepted patents on ornamentation. So it's news to me!
Good sleuth work.