Headstock patent issue?

It would fall under copyright law and not even close, IMO.
Symmetrical vs assymetrical tuners for one...
Actually, it's part of trademark law, not copyright law. The test is whether the design is so substantially similar that it would cause confusion in the marketplace.

Copyright law applies to written works, works of the performing arts like music, works of visual art, films, etc.
 
There is no way anyone is gonna mistake that for a PRS headstock.
They are about as similar as a Stratocaster and an Explorer headstock.
 
Actually, it's part of trademark law, not copyright law. The test is whether the design is so substantially similar that it would cause confusion in the marketplace.

Copyright law applies to written works, works of the performing arts like music, works of visual art, films, etc.
Thanks for clarifying the details. I don't know much about it.

When I first saw it, the design struck me as very similar.
 
It's close but not close enough....

Just my opinion. The "moon" cut isn't quite there. It's smoothed out
 
Sure is...
Apparently, you can patent a headstock.

https://patents.google.com/patent/USD823376S1/en
That's pretty interesting! Normally this stuff comes under the purview of trademarks, such as this one registered by PRS:


I guess PRS wants to cover all possible bases. But I honestly didn't think the patent office accepted patents on ornamentation. So it's news to me!
 
That's pretty interesting! Normally this stuff comes under the purview of trademarks, such as this one registered by PRS:


I guess PRS wants to cover all possible bases. But I honestly didn't think the patent office accepted patents on ornamentation. So it's news to me!
If you're a tech nerd, a search on PRS patents is pretty cool.
On my cursory examination, the most recent ones appear to revolve around TCI tech. It appears they had to invent new ways of precisely measuring and observing what's actually going on.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top