Dispelling Tube Amp Myths

Yes, absolutely didn’t think you were being a jerk at all! I just don’t want someone to sell great tube amps due to the misperception that tubes are going the way of the dodo bird. I’ve seen comments already from guys at TGP that did this. Social media has a habit of creating drama and panic and creating it’s own problems.
Substitute tubes for "Parking lot french fries"...


 
I was thinking about the transformer issue the other day, and wondered why we don't manufacture speakers to match the impedances instead of using a heavy device.

Would that just move the problem to the speaker coil?
 
I was thinking about the transformer issue the other day, and wondered why we don't manufacture speakers to match the impedances instead of using a heavy device.

Would that just move the problem to the speaker coil?
Speakers don't "have" impedances in the way everyone thinks they do. If you did an impedance sweep on a guitar speaker, you'd see a big range of impedance from top to bottom. That's why it's called "nominal" impedance. (I'm guessing you know that). But the interaction of that speaker with the OT is part of the equation as well, as EM7 mentioned above. And how the speaker itself reacts with the OT of a tube amp is different than how it reacts with a solid state amp.

And this is where you get into what you want out of a guitar amp... looser, spongier (vintage tube) or tighter, punchier (SS, or tube amps designed to be so, again as mentioned by EM7).

In general (ONLY!) one could reasonably assume that if you're totally into the sag and spongy feel of a vintage tube amp, most SS designs won't react the way you like your amp to do, but if you like the tight, fast (some Mesa, etc.) tube amps, then you're probably going to be more receptive to the feel of a good SS amp. But (and this is TOTALLY IMHO only!) what I just said would apply to more traditional Class A/B designs... I'm still trying to figure out where Class D fits into this overall, because so far they've been all over the place with a big majority of those designs being "cheap" and only the last few years have people pushed more towards trying to make them truly "better." I've seen this push in stereo equipment, was well as the Quilter and a few others guitar implementations.
 
Speakers don't "have" impedances in the way everyone thinks they do. If you did an impedance sweep on a guitar speaker, you'd see a big range of impedance from top to bottom. That's why it's called "nominal" impedance. (I'm guessing you know that). But the interaction of that speaker with the OT is part of the equation as well, as EM7 mentioned above. And how the speaker itself reacts with the OT of a tube amp is different than how it reacts with a solid state amp.

And this is where you get into what you want out of a guitar amp... looser, spongier (vintage tube) or tighter, punchier (SS, or tube amps designed to be so, again as mentioned by EM7).

In general (ONLY!) one could reasonably assume that if you're totally into the sag and spongy feel of a vintage tube amp, most SS designs won't react the way you like your amp to do, but if you like the tight, fast (some Mesa, etc.) tube amps, then you're probably going to be more receptive to the feel of a good SS amp. But (and this is TOTALLY IMHO only!) what I just said would apply to more traditional Class A/B designs... I'm still trying to figure out where Class D fits into this overall, because so far they've been all over the place with a big majority of those designs being "cheap" and only the last few years have people pushed more towards trying to make them truly "better." I've seen this push in stereo equipment, was well as the Quilter and a few others guitar implementations.
Pretty much nails it.
 
Hey @Em7 I have one for you.

What are your thoughts on the following statement, which seems to be heard almost daily on the internet?

"To increase clean headroom of your your amp, use lower gain pre-amp tubes, like 12AT7 or 5751."

Is that a "tube amp myth?" Discuss.
 
Back
Top