CU22 v. 594 tone video?

Elliot

Gandalf the Vintage Yellow
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
939
Has anyone found any videos comparing the tones of 594 to other PRS 22 fret models w/ 85/15s? Or even current 22 fret models without 85/15. I've been wanting to hear it stacked up next to 245, CU22, DGT, anything...

I've only been able to find Anderton's comparison of the 594 to the CU24.
 
Still haven't found PRS 594 vs. any other 22 fret model but I did find this comparison with LP at the very end of the video. I have skimmed over this video a few times and never noticed the part that says "shootout".

You guys can interpret for yourselves.

 
IMHO vids are just OK when it comes to sound quality, if you find a shop that has a 594 I'd make the trip.
 
I just got done playing a 594 WL that had a 59/09 in the bridge and compared it to several of my other 22 fret PRSi
The 594 has many of the traits that make folks love a LP with better playability and upper fret access of a double cut guitar, the Pattern Vintage neck is similar to a WF and to me much like the 513 neck.
The 594 to me is a killer full sounding ( if slightly more vintage ) 22 fret PRS and would be a great addition to any PRS or guitar collection.
I would say overall that the 594 is a bit fuller or beefier sounding than a CU22 but I for one would not sell a CU22 to have a 594
 
I just got done playing a 594 WL that had a 59/09 in the bridge and compared it to several of my other 22 fret PRSi...

Care to tell me why? I am about 2 hours from Chicago and 2.5 from sweetwater in Fort Wayne but I'm in medical school so I don't have a ton of time. I've been really curious about the 594 worship lately.

I love the classic PRS 25 inch scale length and I want a versatile 22 fretter. But I do like the allure of LP style play for classic rock and blues without switching over to Gibson.
 
Care to tell me why? I am about 2 hours from Chicago and 2.5 from sweetwater in Fort Wayne but I'm in medical school so I don't have a ton of time. I've been really curious about the 594 worship lately.

I love the classic PRS 25 inch scale length and I want a versatile 22 fretter. But I do like the allure of LP style play for classic rock and blues without switching over to Gibson.
I sold my LP (which I have for over 30 years) and purchase a 594 & I have not looked back. You won't regret it.
 
Care to tell me why? I am about 2 hours from Chicago and 2.5 from sweetwater in Fort Wayne but I'm in medical school so I don't have a ton of time. I've been really curious about the 594 worship lately.

I love the classic PRS 25 inch scale length and I want a versatile 22 fretter. But I do like the allure of LP style play for classic rock and blues without switching over to Gibson.

Oh no. Good luck to you sir. I'm so happy (and fortunate) that my guitar obsession did not begin either during medical school or subsequent training. It would have had a severely adverse affect on my future!

I'm sure you have already read quite a bit regarding the allure of the 594. It seems to me that the 24.594" scale length seems to fall into a place that is appealing to both the 24.5 and 25" fans. To me, the thicker body helps quite a bit as well. Definitely go give it a shot if/when you get the chance!

Kevin
 
The heart of the problem for me is that the CU22 used market is a bit more accessible and if the CU22 is versatile enough to achieve old classic les Paul style tones, I'd prefer to stick with CU22. Although I really dig the 594 electronics.
 
There are things done to the 594 that seem to bring out that vintage vibe IT sounded KILLER with my MKII Mesa also sounded nice with my H but it just had something special with the Mesa.
As far as why I like the CU22 or others better.
Control Layout - I started out life as a F type player I like my controls simple ( less knobs are better ) and near the bridge.
I am not looking for a shorter scale I came from 25.5 " scale so the 25 1/4 on the 513 ( and others ) and the 25 on most of other PRS just works for me.
So far my Starla is the exception to that rule I believe the thin body makes it feel more like my other guitars.
I have always had a Love / Hate thing with G guitars love the sound BUT always felt a bit cramped except on Vs and SGs , I NEVER really bonded with a Les Paul as the neck pickup tended to be to dark for me.
I also love the fact that my Customs sound big and are so thin nice and close to the body when I play.
So I would say if you want a Killer guitar that leans to the " G " side of things , with a nice full neck and body with lots of tone options take a long look at the 594.
If you like a bit more room and live for the classic PRS to F thing look at a Custom 22 or McCarty or a 513 , 509 , NF3 , DC3
I see no wrong answer :) just lots of fun
 
Rider, I really appreciate your insight. Thanks for that. Honestly, I love the idea of being able to play a lot of bluesy rock, and classic rock of the LP persuasion. However, I am still very interested in maintaining versatility. I grew up listening to metal and "hardcore" as the kids of my generation may, or may not, have called it. I plan on keeping my SE CU24 as a shredstick for metal and rock.

I think cu22 would be a good path for me and McCarty as well. I have recently done some DGT research and I wont overlook DGT in the future either. Although, I'm not a fan of jumbo frets.

Thanks chaps for the replies.
 
It´s hard to erase years and years of prejudged concepts and marketing campaings, but the first thing that you have to understand (I´m still in the process) is that a 594 is a PRS guitar. It´s not a Gibson Les Paul neither a Fender Stratocaster. Many people sing the known song "PRSi don´t have caracter, personality like a Les Paul or a Strat or a Tele". Of course, if your reference is a Les Paul or a Strat or a Tele, a PRS will never sound like them. PRS have its distinctive sound. With a 594 you can sound close to a Les Paul, but with its own caracter, the PRS caracter, more balanced tone and more piano-like note definition.
It´s like comparing an opera singer against Bruce Springsteen. Both have their sound and their style, each one in his world.
 
It´s hard to erase years and years of prejudged concepts and marketing campaings, but the first thing that you have to understand (I´m still in the process) is that a 594 is a PRS guitar....

I understand that. However, PRS definitely had something in mind when they designed the 594. It is, of course, not an exact match. Some would argue its not even a close match. I still choose to think of the 594 as a tonally different, likely more versatile, extremely reliable, PRS response to the LP. Some would disagree

I've just been wanting to hear more about people's journey through the recent 594 explosion.
 
Back
Top