Alnus Rubra
Loving nature’s wonders
but why strat instead full jazz-master
No idea, just my feeble attempt at juvenile humour.
Or maybe I just improvised.
but why strat instead full jazz-master
Maybe he was into flat picking
but why strat instead full jazz-master
I’ve been tempted to try them ever since I came across this blog post:
https://tonefiend.com/guitar/flatwound_addiction/
Thanks for this post Kiwi, helped me cross a lot of mental bridges on the flatwound trail!!! I have been thinking about them due to their ability to silence the slides and other string sounds. I know that good technique can take care of a lot of that, but sometimes, you just can't pick the fingers up high enough and move them quickly enough to the next spot to do what you want, so being able to slide to that position without the noise would be a blessing. After a little research, I had read that the flat wounds were the way to go, but that tone is a downer on most of them. Considering I don't have my own "tone", and can modify tone to my satisfaction most times anyway using gear and effects, I think I could get along with these. And if the T I jazz are that good at maintaining a balanced tone, I can't wait! My HBII will love them I am sure! Time to place an order!I have an odd gear recommendation. It may be esoteric, but stay with me. It has to do with strings.
Thomastik-Infeld flatwounds.
Okay, if you're still reading ...
The T-I strings tame the problem children in my guitar collection, then send them off to finishing school, where they then get admitted to top colleges.
1) The Gretsch Setzer 6120 is a wildly idiosyncratic beast. Very bright highs, woofy lows, very prone to feedback, often thin, sometimes just screechy, very picky about amps (it marries Marshalls and spurns Matchless). It is an acoustic guitar with two pickups dropped in. I've used everything from 11 gauge nickel wounds to 11 flatwound D'Adds to regular nickel 10s and 12s. They all sounded varying shades of okay. The D'Add flatwounds just sucked the life out that sparkling guitar. Thorazine for tone.
Then I put in a set of T-I jazz flatwound 11s. It smoothed everything out, restored balance across the strings, kept the essential hollowbody sound and smartened things right up. The 6120 is now a lively conversationalist.
2) The PRS Modern Eagle Quatro (MEQ) is another problem child, the one vanity piece in my collection. The solid rosewood neck is a very different ride. It offers piano-like clear lows, brilliant highs, and so much sustain that it became problematic: Sustaining notes (especially the low ones) would all smear into each other.
I tried everything: up to 11s, downtuned to D standard, 10s, 9s.... till I finally settled on the lowest 3 strings from a 9 set and the top 3 from a 10 set, all nickel wound, to try to tame it. Screwy, but it worked.
This weekend I put on a set of 10-44 T-I flatwounds on the MEQ and again it just completely smoothed out and livened up the guitar. Way more livable (and playable - the low 9s were just wet noodles in my ham fists). All while retaining the sound that made it unique.
The rap on flatwounds is that they can dull down any guitar, and that was my experience ... until I tried the T-Is. They keep the guitar's juiciness, and they even it all out and make it behave. I'm not even sure that if you didn't know they were flatwounds that you could tell from the tone.
Who'd a thunk a mere set of strings would be a Swiss governess for the problem children?
There is, however ... ahem ... <cough> a certain cost to this solution.
T-I flats are not just eye-wateringly expensive. They are knee-bucklingly expensive.
But it's your children. Want them to behave? Want to make them presentable to top colleges? You'll pay what it takes, and you will thank me later.
=K
I have an odd gear recommendation. It may be esoteric, but stay with me. It has to do with strings.
Thomastik-Infeld flatwounds.
=K
I tried the D'Adarrio Chrome flatwounds on my McCarty 594 HBII (NO Piezo though) and was frustrated with the g string breaking two days in! Up until then, I was fine with the tone and LOVED the feel of them!! I have some Thomastik's but they are 11's and I am leery to put on because I think the nut on my HBII is made for 10's and lower (it came with 10's). If I am wrong about this, please do let me know. I have some 12's as well from DR but have not tried them for the same reason. I did not think about the nut and it's capabilities when I bought them, and am reluctant to change or modify the nut to try them (or waste them if they do not work out with the stock nut).Anyone ever try flatwounds on a PRS hollowbody guitar with the piezo pickup choice?
I tried the D'Adarrio Chrome flatwounds on my McCarty 594 HBII (NO Piezo though) and was frustrated with the g string breaking two days in! Up until then, I was fine with the tone and LOVED the feel of them!! I have some Thomastik's but they are 11's and I am leery to put on because I think the nut on my HBII is made for 10's and lower (it came with 10's). If I am wrong about this, please do let me know. I have some 12's as well from DR but have not tried them for the same reason. I did not think about the nut and it's capabilities when I bought them, and am reluctant to change or modify the nut to try them (or waste them if they do not work out with the stock nut).
Awesome suggestion! Thanks for that!! It makes sense and I will give it a go!!!I would take the low E from the pack of the T-I 11's and unwrap it just enough to get the body of the string into the nut slot and move it back and forth to see if it binds. I would try it on the bridge notch too. The fact that it's a flat wound rather than round wound may make a difference. You can always loop the string back up to put in its envelope.