Sounds like you've been talking to Greg Koch at Wildwood Guitars!Seconded. My DGT makes my Dr. Z sound like a cotton trampoline. I would only add that the speaker cab will also contribute.
Well, if changing pickups is a sin, I'm-a goin' to the hot place in a handbasket.
Behold my recent acquisition of a PRS SC-J from 2009. It came stock with PRS Archtop pickups. I've honestly never cared for those pickups; I've had them in three PRS hollowbodies, and I've changed them out for 53/10s every time.
But 53/10s are unobtainium now, and I had a funny feeling that a set of gold humbuckers I had sitting in another guitar might just do the trick, for the SC-J.
If I'm going to hell for pickup changes, I'm going to the hottest part of Hades ... for putting Gibson Classic 57s into a Paul Reed Smith guitar! (My guitar tech and I had a good laugh - he is in Witness Protection now.)
Turned out to be a good idea. The Classic 57s have better mids, a sweeter top, and a nice round full bottom, compared to the stock PRS Archtop pickups.
On with the show:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Well, if changing pickups is a sin, I'm-a goin' to the hot place in a handbasket.
Behold my recent acquisition of a PRS SC-J from 2009. It came stock with PRS Archtop pickups. I've honestly never cared for those pickups; I've had them in three PRS hollowbodies, and I've changed them out for 53/10s every time.
But 53/10s are unobtainium now, and I had a funny feeling that a set of gold humbuckers I had sitting in another guitar might just do the trick, for the SC-J.
If I'm going to hell for pickup changes, I'm going to the hottest part of Hades ... for putting Gibson Classic 57s into a Paul Reed Smith guitar! (My guitar tech and I had a good laugh - he is in Witness Protection now.)
Turned out to be a good idea. The Classic 57s have better mids, a sweeter top, and a nice round full bottom, compared to the stock PRS Archtop pickups.
On with the show:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The macassar ebony headstock facing has this insane wavy ribboning going on, too. I'll try to get a picture up.
-K-
Yeah, here we go:
![]()
=K
Turns out PRS does not make 57/08s with gold covers (those would have been my first choice) so I was forced to ... uh ... install another brand. <looks away in shame>
-K-
**UPDATE** April 19, 2018**
I recently acquired a set of 57/09s hybrids (nickel covers, gold screw heads) on the used market for somewhat less than a year at Harvard.
That's the sound I was looking for, and the SC-J is happy. The top end is sweeter and there's no longer any brittleness, and the bottom end is rounder and clearer. Somehow, I can hear the hollowness of this hollowbody guitar a bit better.
My experience, then: The Gibson Classic 57s sounded much better than the stock PRS Archtops, and the 57/08s sound just that last little bit better than the 57s.
All is right with the universe again. This fine PRS guitar has terrific PRS pickups installed in it, not That Other Brand. (And my guitar tech can get out of Witness Protection for putting in the G's.)
=K
Yep.]
It's like have non-Benz rims on a Benz
To me, the M pickups are the most balanced pickups prs offers.
I´ve searched around the web and the forum about changing pu´s in a core PRS. From what I can tell it seems that even when people change pu´s they tend to stay within the brand? other prs pu´s that is.
I have recently bought a CE 1989 with what I can tell the old vintage pickups pre-hfs and they sound good but maybe a little "narrow" and not 100% as I want them to sound.
In my other main guitars I have put in Tom Anderson´s H2+/H1- so that´s kind of what I look in a pickups, lot´s of low and high´s but with punch of mids aswell. Very balanced I guess
Question is are there PRS pu´s that will get me what I´m looking for and am I "ruining" this old guitar in some way by doing this?
Thanks in advance!
Ive got them in my S2 SC 250 Singlecut too. IMO very underrated Pick ups with good string separation on higher gain levels. Strangely, they never gained the credit they deserved. Would love to hear them in my Mc Carty.