Heh, I did not know that - from reading the descriptions yesterday, they both sounded like slightly fatter version of the Pattern (Wide Fat) neck. But now I read these and that makes sense:The Pattern Vintage profile is both wider and deeper than the DGT profile.
If you've ever played a Wide/Fat or Pattern, the Pattern Vintage adds extra girth in all the right places to fill your palm.
If you've ever played a Regular or Pattern Regular, the DGT feels similar to that.
You make the call on what you like best.
[1]A new Pattern Vintage neck carve, which shares the same width measurements as PRS’s Pattern neck but is slightly thicker front to back and features an asymmetrical carve with a little less meat on the treble side and a little more meat on the bass side of the neck.
[2]The neck is to David’s specs,” elaborates Smith, “which is actually a little smaller carve than PRS’ standard wide fat, and includes much taller frets.
Might involve buying a DGT...
Clearly the only logical conclusion.
So now I want to try a DGT neck. Might involve buying a DGT...
Me too.Hmmm.....I have a DGT..................
Hah! Nice try! That won't work again (mainly because my bank account is still screaming in pain).Hmmm.....I have a DGT..................
Everyone should.Me too.
I thought everybody did.
Hmmm.....I have a DGT..................
Me too.
I thought everybody did.
Hmmm.....I have a DGT..................