This is going in two different directions in my mind, warm is hotter and I guess your term most acoustic would mean more passive to me.the warmest and most acoustic of the pickups?
This is going in two different directions in my mind, warm is hotter...
Actually Huggy, in the audio world warm means “less-extended top end” or “less top end shrillness.”
It doesn’t mean “hotter.” A hotter pickup will usually be brighter, and therefore less warm. I realize that doesn’t seem to make logical sense, but there you have it.
Incidentally, in PRS pickups, if you can find a set of 53/10s, they’re incredible pickups for jazzier tones; articulate, rounded attack, but not as bright as other PRS pickups, including the 58/15s, 58/15 LTs, etc., that are actually pretty sparkly/bright pickups.
My bad, I had my head turned around on the terminology, but from what I actually think I have right is the lower the DC res, the more passive a circuit it is, correct? and that's where the arch top PUs excel being the lowest DC Res of PRS PUs.
I've tried HBs with 58/15s and other pups but they all sounded brighter & "sparkly"-er to me than the archtops.
In case anyone was wondering...had the trusty multi-meter out tonight...
85/15 (CE24) = 7.83Ω / 8.64Ω
58/15 (McCarty) = 7.83Ω / 8.64Ω (not a typo; exactly the same measurements)
58/15 LT (Mc594) = 7.65Ω / 7.69Ω
My bad, I had my head turned around on the terminology, but from what I actually think I have right is the lower the DC res, the more passive a circuit it is, correct? and that's where the arch top PUs excel being the lowest DC Res of PRS PUs.
I have both and like them for jazzy stuff.I agree with Les and Huggy, 53/10’s or some Archtop’s.
I have both and like them for jazzy stuff.
I have never played 85/15 in any form, so can’t comment on them.
According to our own CantankerousCarl:
Whatever happened to him?
Wife killed him for bringing one last guitar home?
That’s exactly what happened to me a few years ago.
So, how is bachelorhood?
You're correct, though I wouldn't use the word "passive," as that's more of a technical term (as in the opposite of "active," i.e. battery-powered). But yeah, the lower the DC res, the lower the output, generally speaking. And lower-output pickups tend to also have more clarity. None of this is 100% true all of the time, but generally speaking, these are truisms.
I was specifically recommending the 58/15 LT, which is a different pickup. The LT stands for "low turn," which means fewer winds of wire, which in turn means lower resistance and lower output. According to our own CantankerousCarl:
As you can see, the 58/15 LT measures a lower resistance, particularly in the bridge position.
The McCarty Archtop pickups tended to measure 6.20Ω / 7.00Ω, so they'll be even lower resistance. I hated them in my HBII for rock tones, but they're probably good for jazz. Easier to get than the 58/15 LTs, too.
Yeah I'm just screwed up terminology-wise. Don't know what the right terms are for pups with less or more resistance in the circuit, but that, the windings, and the magnet are what makes the most difference in tone from what I've read on the subject.Actually, I think the term ‘passive’ in pickups simply means that they don’t need a DC power supply from a battery or other power source in order to provide a signal/gain. ‘Active’ pickups need a battery.
Please double-check, but I think I’m correct; passive guitar pickups use magnetic coils, active pickups are battery powered (though I suppose they could be powered from a power supply of some kind, I just haven’t seen any of those, and doubt anyone’s marketed them).