Aged PRS Guitars - Yay or Nay?

MrKite

New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Messages
48
I am not sure whether I can bond with those.

First, isn't it a bit of a mindf#*k to make a guitar look like it is 50 years old when it hasn't been around at that time at all? And second, part of the PRS fascination for me is the craftsmanship which includes all those shiny and new materials and parts.

What do you think?

examples:

https://www.guitarmaverick.com/prs-private-stock-7132-aged-594-mccarty/

https://larkguitars.com/collections...tock-mccarty-594-aged-faded-mccarty-burst-717

https://larkguitars.com/collections...ty-594-singlecut-aged-faded-mccarty-burst-644
 
Nay for me. Never been into that. Although I do like the look of an old 50's or 60's strat and I would take any one of those old strats if someone wanted to give me one. But if i'm buying any guitar new, I want it to look new. (at least for a few years)
 
My guitars relic and age at a frightening pace, largely due to my clumsiness.

So I'll do all of that myself, don't need any help, thank you very much.
 
Nay for me. Never been into that. Although I do like the look of an old 50's or 60's strat and I would take any one of those old strats if someone wanted to give me one. But if i'm buying any guitar new, I want it to look new. (at least for a few years)
Ditto here
 
I'm in the minority, I guess. I see where you guys are coming from, but I like the look myself.

I like the look as well. I just don't want to pay top dollar for a new guitar that already looks old. Sadly, much like us, they all start looking old eventually.
 
6d8d6468e207623cf755f972a6327c2a.jpg


I always liked the relic job on this, but man, it seems like it takes this guy years to get it done! :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top