dmatthews
Dave's not here
Me threeI had a bunch of the earlier McCartys with the vintage tuners. Never had a problem. But I’m lazy.
Me threeI had a bunch of the earlier McCartys with the vintage tuners. Never had a problem. But I’m lazy.
Glancing at the ones from my old 335, they are cheap looking because the insert molding technology of the 60s was not very advanced. The molding seams aren’t clean and the color is...umm...dirty. The new ones have better seams. That’s it. And the buttons aren’t replaceable either....I would have to replace those buttons as they do look cheap...
The new vintage tuners does something to the midrange response which makes the guitar sound more open. You can achieve the same effect by removing the locking thumb screws on your Phase III tuners. If you don't like the vintage tuners, Phase III tuners are a direct replacement.
Yeah, but did he try wings?The new vintage tuners does something to the midrange response which makes the guitar sound more open. You can achieve the same effect by removing the locking thumb screws on your Phase III tuners. If you don't like the vintage tuners, Phase III tuners are a direct replacement.
Yeah, but did he try wings?
I can personally give you one extremely relevant answer because I'm disabled and hands full of arthritis. For people like me who need some help restringing a guitar. There's nothing wrong with making things easier and more convenient. I for one totally appreciate locking tuners and no one on the planet can convince me that a person can hear the difference between machine heads in their guitar tone. That's beyond absurd.I don't understand why locking tuners are needed on a non-tremolo guitar so I dig the retro look, IMHO
I just put a set of the Kluson locking tuners from John Mann on my 2009 McCarty. Direct, drop-in replacements. I've only plugged it in and played it once since doing so but my ears didn't notice a difference in tone. Of course I was playing the red channel of my TC50 and I firmly believe that the more gain you use the less the guitars physical components come through in the tone. also, my ears aren't the best. Thank you Jon Lord!
I made the swap solely for ease of restringing. I wear out strings at a very quick pace so the locking tuners make restringing so much easier and quicker. I also never had an issue with tuning stability with the original non-locking tuners.
I am seriously considering putting locking tuners on the rest of my "gigging" guitars to make restringing easier and quicker. As a point of reference I need to replace strings after about 2 gigs worth of playing time. I can stretch it to three gigs but that is pushing my luck and anything longer than that and I am asking for string related problems. I'm trying to let up on the death grip I have on the neck while playing, but 40 hears of bad habit is hard to break.
C'mon, how do you really feel???I personally believe PRS are full of **** with their better tone explanation. On an acoustic, maybe. Through an electric amp, its nonsense. This decision to put Lego plastic on the tips of .50 cent tuners in place of those locking tuners they used is for one reason only. Profit. Its shameful and insulting to treat people like morons by claiming its for tone purposes. To put $2 tuners on a $4500 guitar is ridiculous and with my being disabled with horrid arthritis and severe back issues, I have to spend a further $200 so I can restring my own guitar rather than having to take it to a guitar shop.
C'mon, how do you really feel???
For the record, there is a half an ounce difference in weight. Yeah, I weighed them.
Interesting to note, though, that I got a replacement thumbscrew with it even though there are no locking tuners. That's a little weird, right?
It's like a crack dealer giving you a sample just to get you hooked. Beware!!!!
It's like a crack dealer giving you a sample just to get you hooked. Beware!!!!
Check w/John Mann - he may either have PRS lockers that will fit, or he may be able to convert the S2s. I know he can for the SEs - not sure about the S2s.