Ovibos
Naughty Wood Librarian
Agufish has been doing this series for a while, and it's PRS' turn!
This guy has an annoying demeanor and editing style, but he's pandering to me, so I approve.
he is willing to mess with a successful pattern (even when I think he shouldn't).
Knowing how I feel now, Paul could’ve stopped changing stuff in 1984. A West Street, KL33, or a Santana is downright perfection (for me).
Edit: Oh, and I totally would’ve stopped trying to make new humbucker designs after the 57/08, 59/09, and 53/10’s... I’d coast and sit on my @ss.
That’s the problem - they keep coming up with new things worth owning.But the 85/15 and 58/15 are pretty sweet, too!
He's right about Paul. I've always liked his connection to the instruments made, and that he is willing to mess with a successful pattern (even when I think he shouldn't). He hasn't settled into living on his reputation, and he is still in the driver's seat for the company. I know it's coming one day, but I am going to personally hate it when he is no longer there. Regardless of quality, I think that one day there will be a "Paul was there, Post-Paul was there" line in the perception of the brand. He is that important to what PRS guitars are.
If I'm lucky, I won't see that day in my lifetime.
I was thinking about this just a few minutes ago in another thread: "what happens after Paul?" I follow Taylor guitars a little bit, and Andy Power is clearly being set up to become the face and public innovator of the company after Bob Taylor. I think that's really smart. Does Paul have a successor he's grooming? Seems like a good thing to do for the future of the company.
There's more than one signature on the headstock of every private stock guitar...I was thinking about this just a few minutes ago in another thread: "what happens after Paul?" I follow Taylor guitars a little bit, and Andy Power is clearly being set up to become the face and public innovator of the company after Bob Taylor. I think that's really smart. Does Paul have a successor he's grooming? Seems like a good thing to do for the future of the company.
There's more than one signature on the headstock of every private stock guitar...
On the back. Granted other names probably shouldn't go on the front. But who supplies the innovations after Paul? Paul Miles? Skitchy (I'm just throwing out names I know)? Somebody else?
If we as guitarists are lucky, this will be true!The age to which most of us are living, Paul will be around for at least another 30 years, probably out living a lot of us!
He's right about Paul. I've always liked his connection to the instruments made, and that he is willing to mess with a successful pattern (even when I think he shouldn't). He hasn't settled into living on his reputation, and he is still in the driver's seat for the company. I know it's coming one day, but I am going to personally hate it when he is no longer there. Regardless of quality, I think that one day there will be a "Paul was there, Post-Paul was there" line in the perception of the brand. He is that important to what PRS guitars are.
If I'm lucky, I won't see that day in my lifetime.
That G-brand would have enlarge the headstock to fit Henry’s family name!Absolutely! Otherwise we’d be talking about CBS and Henry guitars!
Does Paul have a successor he's grooming? Seems like a good thing to do for the future of the company.
I nominate @Shawn@PRSI was thinking about this just a few minutes ago in another thread: "what happens after Paul?" I follow Taylor guitars a little bit, and Andy Power is clearly being set up to become the face and public innovator of the company after Bob Taylor. I think that's really smart. Does Paul have a successor he's grooming? Seems like a good thing to do for the future of the company.