Mozzi
https://imgur.com/user/BAMozzy/posts
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2018
- Messages
- 4,285
I agree. The only ‘better’ that counts is whether something’s a better fit for the person making the choice.
I pick guitars to impress only myself.
On this, I do agree - although only in the case of the PS guitars you commissioned yourself. The fact that you hot to pick the woods, the pick-ups, the switching, the colour and inlays etc etc - essentially having a guitar built to your preference so therefore it 'must' be a better fit and you also have an attachment to that instrument long before it actually becomes an instrument.
I know that if I got to pick the maple top, the Mahogany back and neck, the rosewood fretboard and inlays etc to make a PS 594 in Fire Red Burst, even though both the PS and my Core have exactly the same materials, same pick-ups and electronics, the very fact that I commissioned the PS, picked everything myself and virtually 'birthed' that instrument, it would be 'better' to me - even if others couldn't tell them apart in a blind test. That PS would be special because I commissioned it, I chose every part of it.
If I were able to buy the Graveyard 2, it would be 'special' in a different way. The design on the neck and headstock, although I am not too keen on the back of the body colour, and the fact that I would be just 1 of 60 to own it would make it special. Its the same with those Dragon guitars I lust after - these are 'special' guitars and I almost wouldn't care how well they played or sounded because I wouldn't necessarily buy them for that purpose. Not saying I would 'never' play them, just not really ROCK on them or would let them out of the house. Apart from the odd 'Shop' demoing these guitars, I bet you won't see anyone playing these guitars regularly on tour - I have never seen a PRS Dragon being rocked regularly on a tour.
Point is, Some PS are special in a different way to being special because you had a massive impact by choosing everything and having it built specifically for you. Other PS, those that have been built to another person/retailer specs may not be much (if any) better than a regular core. They could even be slightly worse tonally if you prefer the woods in a regular core. Someone's choice to pick brighter, snappier woods that lose a bit of that warmth and depth of mahogany may not be 'better' than your Core version.
Private Stock encompasses too many variations. By variations I am referring to he fact that PRS build their own PS (such as the Dragons and Graveyard 2) and some that are prelude to core versions. then you have those that are commissioned by others and built to 'their' specs (or yours if you are in a position to do so). Therefore, you get those that are pieces of art (as well as an instrument of course). The craftsmanship and intricacy of the designs - whether its all the inlay work of all those little pieces that combine to form an image, or some elaborate carving, they are amazing pieces of art. Then you have those instruments that showcase the beauty of nature by using the finest woods - many of which are only available in Private Stock and maybe find some 'oddities' in PRS that you won't get in the core line, like fan-fret with evenly spaced out 5 509 pick-ups, 24 fret hollowbody 594 in a natural wood finish that were commissioned. If you don't like the position of the neck pick-up on the 24 fret HB594, it may not be 'better' to you than the regular core version but to the person that commissioned it, I bet its worth every single penny/cent they spent on it and better than any core model because its 'their' baby.
Better is certainly relative when it comes to Private Stock, in fact its relative across the whole spectrum of guitars, price points and preferences. Even if you just take PRS guitars, there are a number of people that are happy with SE's and don't think paying the price for a core because to them, its not 3-5x better to them. All the extra care, attention, quality checks, hands on time etc is not worth the extra money. I also don't know how many times myself or have seen others asked which guitar is better between often very different guitars. Should you buy a PRS Cu24 or a Silver Sky - which is 'better'. Its impossible because they are so very different and would suit different people based on what they prefer or need at that time. Ideally you may want/need both of course. The same applies to the 10top or 'regular' core, I don't know how many times I have seen people ask if a 10top is worth the extra. The same can apply to Wood Library and Private Stock too. Its all relative to the individual and whether or not they have an invested interest in the design/build of an instrument, whether they prefer the aesthetics or woods used of a certain instrument. Too many variables and its all relative. I have seen people say they wouldn't want a core because they would to frightened to take it out of its case and wouldn't want to get it scratched let alone a PS. Some may prefer the snap and chime of a CE24 over a Cu24 its all relative...
There are instruments I would buy (money no object) just because they are aesthetically stunning and wouldn't really care too much how they play or sound - that wouldn't make them 'better' or 'worse' just fulfil a different criteria. There are guitars I would buy because they offer something I want or need tonally - like a 594, 509, Cu24 and my HBii all of which are very different instruments tonally and offer something uniquely different. None of these are 'better' or 'worse', none are necessarily 'better' or 'worse' than the 10 top, wood library or PS versions - different maybe, aesthetically maybe but if I commissioned one, chose everything and had it built specifically for me, I may well feel it is 'better'. I am sure that spending more on a guitar may also make it 'feel' better because of the financial investment but whether its actually better to play (assuming its set-up the same) and/or sound better is subjective.
It would be interesting to blind test with a group of people - that way you get to hear others play so its just the tonal qualities and get to play the instruments so playability is assessed. I think it would be interesting to see if those that commissioned a PS could identify it in a blind test like this. Maybe Rob Chapman could as he seems to be great at identifying things in a blind test but could others too? I do generally hear the difference between an 'S' pick-up and a USA made Pick-up...