You know....sometimes having a long and storied history can be a real disadvantage.
I don’t dispute that Big G has demonstrated some real “head scratcher” decision making over the last few years...and quality is always the hallmark of a great management team and their ability to maintain a happy/productive/engaged workforce...But...
The problem is that every time G or F or M or any of the iconic brands tries anything highly innovative, they get harshly criticized. And then when they make high quality historically accurate reissues, people whine about them being outdated technology or how the price is ridiculously higher than 30-40 years ago. If they release a new mainstream model that incorporates the features/styling modern players prefer they get accused of copying (insert the name of your favorite newer guitar builder here). It’s a tough game to win...and there are always those rooting for the formerly top dog to take a fall. I’m not a huge G fan, never have been, but I can’t see how an iconic American company going down is good for the guitar industry or those of us who love guitars.